Search for: "John Does 10" Results 141 - 160 of 10,101
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The Order does not restrict or limit any employer’s right to ask employees to work from home. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 12:11 am
Smith Unnamed man seeks review of ordinance barring him from parks, trails in Plainfield Convicted sex offender John Doe is continuing his long-running legal battle to be allowed in Plainfield's town parks. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 12:50 am
The ACLU, representing a Marion County man identified only as John Doe, have asked the state's highest court to review a September ruling by the Indiana Court of Appeals that upheld Plainfield's ban. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 9:44 pm
Elizabeth Edwards, the estranged wife of John Edwards, the former U.S. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 12:40 pm by Ross Dannenberg (Gamertag: Aviator)
GRAND VISION GAMING, LLC, TIMOTHY CARSON, and MERLE FRANK, and JOHN DOES 1-10. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Posner smacks lawyers, vindicates objectors in Radio Shack coupon settlement [CCAF, Fisher, more] “Germany To Consider Ban On Late-Night Work Emails” [Alexander Kaufman, Huffington Post] 7th Circuit overturns Wisconsin John Doe ruling, sends back to state judges [Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel] John Doe case prosecutor John Chisholm, via columnist Dan Bice, strikes back against source in office who talked to Stuart Taylor, Jr. [read post]
17 May 2012, 8:42 am by Ray Beckerman
Does 1-13, a subpoena addressed to Verizon, calling for the identities and addresses of John Doe defendants, was returnable May 12th.On May 10th the Court stayed enforcement of the subpoena, and directed plaintiff's counsel to immediately notify Verizon of the stay.Unfortunately, as it turns out, Verizon had responded to the subpoena FIVE (5) DAYS BEFORE THE SUBPOENA'S RETURN DATE, on May 7th.Plaintiff's "motion for clarification"[Ed. note. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 12:23 pm by Ron Coleman
Originally posted 2010-01-11 10:50:32. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:44 am by Steve Hall
Morton did not request, and does not agree to, an expedited issuance of the mandate under these circumstances. [read post]
The court refused to name the man, calling him John Doe instead, because he committed the act of violence in order to achieve fame. [read post]
27 May 2015, 12:37 pm by The Mussallem Law Firm, P.A.
For example, in cases with a minimum mandatory sentence, the minimum mandatory piece does not come into play until the state files it with the court. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 6:43 am by Ron Coleman
Originally posted 2012-10-29 11:41:32. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 7:36 pm
View the article here | Demonization (Wikipedia)10/23/2007This is in response to two recent letters, one by John Benoit (Oct. 5) and the other by Ruth Fuller (Oct. 10).I agree with Benoit that the criminal justice committee should wait for the John Doe lawsuit before considering changes to the sex offender registry.I disagree, however, that the two judges who opined that the registry is additional punishment were gratuitous, they are right on target. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 8:34 am
Indianapolis, IN - Trademark lawyers for AFC Enterprises, Inc. of Georgia, doing business as Popeye's Chicken, filed a trademark infringement suit alleging Christopher Payne, LP&P Foods, and ten John Does of Indiana infringed trademark registration no. 1030944 for the mark POPEYES, 1107575 POPEYE SIGN DESIGN WITH COLOR and numerous other trademarks registered with the US Trademark Office. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 10:27 am
Seven (7) North Carolina State University students named as "John Does" have joined together, in LaFace v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 11:11 am by Ruth O'Meara-Costello
The complainant, Jane Roe, alleged that the sex was not consensual; the respondent, John Doe, insisted that it was. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 6:39 pm by Dennis Crouch
John Martin and his team at Innography have released their bi-annual update on the patent market. [read post]
1 May 2019, 3:05 am by Liz Dunshee
John answered: I think in the absence of guidance from the Corp Fin Staff to the contrary, people should assume that the hyperlink requirement does apply to S-8s, for the reasons you suggest. [read post]