Search for: "John Does 2-4" Results 81 - 100 of 5,975
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2007, 12:44 am
Moreover, the Examining Attorney submitted a 1999 registration for KEEBLER that issued pursuant to Section 2(f).The Board therefore affirmed the refusal to register.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 12:38 pm
and the number of clients it has brought me is small, although this does seem to be increasing. 4. [read post]
1 May 2013, 1:36 pm by Ron Coleman
 John Doe #2, perhaps, gets the benefit of Supreme Court rule-making, according to this opinion; but first John Doe #1 has to have his cover blown. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”[2] This was not the “compact theory” eventually espoused by John C. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 5:48 pm
By Big Tent Democrat Update [2008-2-4 21:1:50 by Big Tent Democrat]: Jeralyn's buddy, Dan Abrams of MSNBC, is now talking about the anti-Hillary bias in the Media now. [read post]
  Such persons truly are "self-employed" under the standard definition.If you are Misclassified as an Independent Contractor and Laid Off, You are Entitled to Unemployment Benefits - Coronavirus or NotHowever, there is a larger contingent of 1099 workers - they do work only for one company, and are not paid w-2 wages (often because the company does not want them "on the payroll. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 9:05 am by Guest Author
Because section 706(2) does not tell courts to give a remedy of vacatur as setting aside, that provision does not call for a universal remedy. [read post]
2 May 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
 By Eric SegallLast week on the Law & Liberty blog, Professor John McGinnis, a well-known academic originalist and libertarian, reviewed Professor Adrian Vermeule's new book "Common Good Constitutionalism. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 11:05 am
The Program in Ethics and Brain Sciences (PEBS) is a collaborative neuroethics effort of the Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics and the Johns Hopkins Brain Sciences Institute. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 4:30 am
Applying its standard Section 2(e)(4) analysis, the Board affirmed a refusal to register the mark DAIMLER for "land vehicles," finding that the PTO had made out a prima facie case that the mark is primarily merely a surname, and that Applicant Jaguar had failed to rebut the PTO's case. [read post]