Search for: "John Does A, B and C" Results 61 - 80 of 2,284
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2012, 2:46 pm by John Palley
(c)”Indirect contest” means a pleading in a proceeding in any court that indirectly challenges the validity of an instrument or one or more of its terms based on any other ground not contained in subdivision (b), and that does not contain any of those grounds. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am by centerforartlaw
No Private Benefit Provision of 501(c)(3) Museums While § 501(c)(3) does not specifically mention private benefits restrictions,[16] it is found in the Treasury Regulation § 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(1)(ii), which prohibits an organization from operating “for the benefit of private interests such as designated individuals, the creator or his family, shareholders of the organization, or persons controlled, directly or indirectly, by such private… [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 7:53 am by Joy Waltemath
The Maryland suit included a John Doe plaintiff who is a lawful permanent resident whose Iranian wife is seeking entry. [read post]
15 May 2014, 8:00 am
Malibu Media contends that infringement by John Doe of the works, which include multiple pornographic movies, began on September 14, 2013. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:24 am by Michael Lowe
Before the running of the statute of limitations, the District Attorney’s Office will agree to cases involving a Conditional Dismissal IF the Petitioner signs a waiver saying that Dallas County may keep (a) his/her name, (b) date of birth, (c) offense, and (d) State identification number. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 4:45 pm by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
§ 47524(c)(2)(B) [“the restriction does not create an unreasonable burden on interstate or foreign commerce”]. [read post]
11 May 2007, 7:02 am by John C. Schropp
The Appellants objected to the proposed settlement on the grounds that "'[t]he Debtor, John Breen, has an individual interest, separate and distinct from the estate, in the State Litigation, to which the Trustee’s authority does not extend.'"The Bankruptcy Court found "'[T]hat (a) but for the amount of $500, the causes of action set forth in the Complaint and Amended Complaint pending in the Circuit Court of Baltimore County, ... are property of… [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 4:01 am by John L. Welch
TTABlog comment: This appellate decision may be of minimal legal import, but it does provide a welcome opportunity to resurrect a golden oldie from the TTABlog songbook: namely, "T-T-A-B. [read post]