Search for: "John Does A, B and C" Results 121 - 140 of 2,290
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2011, 10:52 am by David Lat
If John O’Brien does in fact plead guilty today, as the NYLJ predicts, we will update this post.UPDATE (7 PM): O’Brien pleaded guilty, as reported by the New York Law Journal:Former Sullivan & Cromwell partner John J. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 5:36 pm by Andrew Delaney
The ALJ’s conclusion was that Bourbeau failed to meet parts A and B for all 5 of the workers, and failed to meet Part C for all except Parah. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 7:20 am by Marty Lederman
  Subsection 5000A(b), in turn, provides that if (most) of those covered individuals covered by subsection (a) fail to maintain such insurance, they must pay a “shared responsibility payment” to the IRS “in the amount determined under subsection (c). [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 7:20 am by Adebayo Lanlokun, Olswang LLP
John Mander Pension Scheme Trustees Ltd was appointed to replace Louvre Trustees Limited on 12 March 2002. [read post]
3 May 2016, 12:09 am by Bill Marler
Long-Term and Permanent Injury Although a minority of botulism patients eventually recovers their pre-infection health, the majority does not. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 11:21 pm by admin@lawiscoool.com (Omar Ha-Redeye)
A Primer on Freedom Let’s begin our discussion with a review of the Ann Coulter affair, which bears some analogues to the Québéc niqab issue. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 10:48 am by Gabriel Schoenfeld
Over at National Review, former federal prosecutor Andrew C. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 2:30 pm by Tom Lamb
We point out that the FDA is not obliged to follow recommendations of its advisory committees but it usually does. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 10:24 am
C. 5713.03), as amended in 2012 as part of Ohio House Bill 487.R. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 10:24 am
C. 5713.03), as amended in 2012 as part of Ohio House Bill 487.R. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 2:37 pm by Michael C. Smith
Oncross-examination, Plaintiff’s technical expert conceded that the accused product does notperform the “sending,” “calculating,” and “transmitting” steps of subparts (a), (b), and (c)1 ofindependent claim 6. [read post]