Search for: "John Does I-X" Results 81 - 100 of 864
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2007, 5:25 am
[I am posting here an entry written by Tam Ho, a former student of mine who offers a refutation of the claims that John Edwards is a hypocrite whose stated concern for the poor is undermined by his rich lifestyle. -- Neil H. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 11:10 am
”The long-running case relates to Groia’s defence of client John Felderhof, a Bre-X officer and director, in proceedings launched by the Ontario Securities Commission. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 7:02 am by David Markus
And it does not end with weekly salary payments. [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 6:45 am by Sam Bray
” Now when the Supreme Court says, “We’re not expressing an opinion on x,” you can be pretty sure the justices are expressing an opinion on x. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 9:41 pm
Less obviously, that X is a legal cause of Y does not entail that X is a cause-in-fact of Y. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 6:39 am by David Markus
  N.D.Fla Judge John Richard Smoak Jr. has reassigned all of his cases. [read post]
15 May 2011, 5:54 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
John Blackstone on "Standing Tall. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
An ordinal function tells us that individual i prefers possible world X to possible world Y, but it doesn't tell us whether X is much better than Y or only a little better. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 3:39 pm by Lawrence Solum
An ordinal function tells us that individual i prefers possible world X to possible world Y, but it doesn't tell us whether X is much better than Y or only a little better. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 12:39 pm by Lawrence Solum
An ordinal function tells us that individual i prefers possible world X to possible world Y, but it doesn't tell us whether X is much better than Y or only a little better. [read post]
31 May 2023, 5:16 am by Herb Lin
Teaching cybersecurity and cyber policy at universities such as Stanford, UC Berkeley, and Johns Hopkins. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 10:16 pm by Jeff Richardson
  John Gruber of Daring Fireball has some excellent examples of both photos and videos in low light in this set on Flickr. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 8:54 am by Josh Blackman
” The third element is also true, if in fact a “corrupt” action is “inconsistent with the official duty”: if the Constitution does not give the president the power to do X, then Congress can pass a statute that prevents the president from doing X. [read post]
28 May 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Does that mean that someone with just X is eligible or not? [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 4:55 pm
Leading liberal scholars such as Michael X. [read post]