Search for: "John Does Persons A-M" Results 61 - 80 of 4,415
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2024, 11:00 pm
”While M stated that he lived alone and did not match the description of the individual listed in the process server’s affidavit, the AT2 thought that wasn’t a sufficient response since he didn’t disavow that someone matching the “John Doe’s” description was present at the residence and accepted service on his behalf.Since M’s challenge was viewed as “conclusory and unsubstantiated,” the AT2 thought he… [read post]
1 May 2013, 1:36 pm by Ron Coleman
 John Doe #2, perhaps, gets the benefit of Supreme Court rule-making, according to this opinion; but first John Doe #1 has to have his cover blown. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
I’m unaware of any nickname for the California FTB, but perhaps a reader in that state can enlighten us. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:05 am by Ronald Collins
Biskupic: Yes, terrifically smart and determined but with a personal reserve, shyness even. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 7:59 pm
Would any person take him seriously if he did? [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 1:09 pm
John Edwards is not my candidate (as of last week, I've come off the fence in favor of Obama). [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 8:12 pm by Nate Russell
Does John Oliver actually need to make it rain cash for Canadians personally to be convicted of inducement? [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 7:30 am
"What does $25 million for peanut storage have to do with the war in Iraq? [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:58 am by SHG
This feed is for personal, non-commercial & Newstex use only. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:07 pm
I don't think that person is Barack Obama.Obama's message is uplifting and hopeful. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:09 am by William Carleton
’” Justice Antonin Scalia was also skeptical of AT&T's argument, Denniston writes: "‘personal characteristics, [Justice Scalia] said, is a phrase that does not apply to General Motors, neither doespersonal qualities,’ nor ‘personal privileges. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 5:13 am by Robert Chesney
That is a critical question in this case, for the statutory authorities on which the government relies to detain John Doe (discussed below) do not expressly state that citizens may be detained. [read post]