Search for: "John Mark Taylor" Results 21 - 40 of 571
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2006, 3:12 pm
In In re Taylor Tate, Inc., Serial No. 78463524 (December 1, 2006) [not citable], the Board found Applicant's spa services to be related to hair and skin care products, and it consequently affirmed a Section 2(d) refusal of the mark shown immediately below [DAY SPA & SHOP disclaimed] in light of the registered mark LOVJOI.Examining Attorney Ingrid C. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 8:31 am
Same goes for Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 11:21 am by John Bellinger
John Kerry, then chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:18 am
Applicant here came close to meeting that standard, depending on which third-party uses and registrations that you count.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 6:47 am by SCOTUSblog
Here’s the Thursday morning read: Supreme Court’s ruling on online harassment outrages victims, advocates (Taylor Lorenz, The Washington Post) For Ketanji Brown Jackson, a self-assured and forceful US Supreme Court debut (Andrew Chung & John Kruzel, Reuters) Here’s what a new Supreme Court case could mean for federal wealth tax proposals (Kate Dore, CNBC) The Supreme Court Wrestles the Rights Monster (Daniel Henninger, The Wall Street Journal)  Neil… [read post]