Search for: "John P. Barrett"
Results 1 - 20
of 122
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
Barrett and Henry “Hank” M. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 11:52 am
Enlarge / Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts and Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor arrive for President Joe Biden's State of the Union address on March 7, 2024, in Washington, DC. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
(BARRETT, J., concurring in part and concurring in the judgment). [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
George P. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
”] [This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Trump prioritized this argument in his briefs to the Court, drawing primarily on the scholarship of Seth Barrett Tillman and his co-author, Josh Blackman. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Did John B. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Ct. 2355, 2376–84 (2023) (Barrett, J., concurring). [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
“Know then thyself, presume not God to scan; The proper study of Mankind is Man. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
(The book itself, on p. 117, described Roe as "a closer and more difficult case" than Bowers v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
Trial MSN – Devlin Barrett, Perry Stein, Robert Barnes, and Rachel Weiner (Washington Post) | Published: 12/11/2023 The U.S. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:00 pm
" That referred to then-Judge Barrett's dissent in Kanter v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 5:25 pm
P. 29(a). [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:44 pm
Dallas in this Blount case, p. 277) ‘indiscriminately used in the Constitution. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
Q&A: Senior Fellows John F. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 2:02 pm
"I think it's a very savvy move not bringing that charge," said John P. [read post]
31 May 2023, 4:00 am
John Roberts and the other Cons in NFIB. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:30 am
Consider his well-known statement in an 1810 letter to John Colvin: [A] strict observance of the written laws is doubtless one of the high duties of a good citizen: but it is not the highest. the laws of necessity, of self-preservation, of saving our country when in danger, are of higher obligation. to lose our country by a scrupulous adherence to written law, would be to lose the law itself, with life, liberty, property & all those who are enjoying them with us;… [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:45 pm
The President's argument is introduced as follows (page 13): "[P]etitioner contends that he occupies a uniqu [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 2:39 pm
I wrote about this episode in my 2017 article, SCOTUS After Scalia (starting at p. 135): In a scene too remarkable to imagine, President Washington "started up in a violet fret. [read post]
