Search for: "John Wiley & Sons, Inc," Results 41 - 60 of 298
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2017, 12:11 pm by Christine Corcos
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2013), and is likely to reappear and influence the Court in a patent case in which it has recently granted certiorari, Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 12:11 pm
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2013), and is likely to reappear and influence the Court in a patent case in which it has recently granted certiorari, Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 9:00 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc) and demand its return without having to reimburse you for the cost (and then resell it to someone else).Heck, under Disney's argument the very act of scribbling in a book could also result in prosecution under copyright laws. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 12:36 pm
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., the common law doctrine barring restraints on alienation, which serves as the basis for patent exhaustion, makes no geographical distinctions— that an authorized sale of a patented article outside the U.S. exhausts the U.S. patent rights in that article. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:28 am by Ron Coleman
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., No. 15-375, that it is appropriate for a court to give substantial weight to the reasonableness of a losing party’s position when deciding whether to award attorney’s fees in a case brought under the Copyright Act as long as “all other relevant factors” are taken into account. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:19 am by John Elwood
John Elwood (finally) reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 4:56 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
News release: “Hoboken, NJ– November 28, 2016—John Wiley & Sons Inc. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 9:43 am by Dennis Crouch
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. that the common law doctrine barring restraints on alienation that is the basis of exhaustion doctrine “makes no geographical distinctions,” a sale of a patented article – authorized by the U.S. patentee – that takes place outside of the United States exhausts the U.S. patent rights in that article. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:00 pm
John Wiley & Sons Inc., which concluded that fees should be awarded to successful copyright litigants. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 4:26 am
John Wiley & Sons, 568 U.S. ___ (2013) (see Kat report here).This time around, the question presented was whether Kirtsaeng could recover his attorney’s fees (totalling over $2 million) from John Wiley & Sons. [read post]