Search for: "John Wiley & Sons, Inc,"
Results 161 - 180
of 298
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2016, 9:43 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. that the common law doctrine barring restraints on alienation that is the basis of exhaustion doctrine “makes no geographical distinctions,” a sale of a patented article – authorized by the U.S. patentee – that takes place outside of the United States exhausts the U.S. patent rights in that article. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 5:26 pm
The ruling comes in the case of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 6:59 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc, in which the Court will consider the legality of purchasing copyrighted works overseas and bringing them back to the U.S. for resale, without the permission of the copyright owner. [read post]
1 May 2015, 10:59 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. implicitly overturns the Federal Circuit precedent Jazz Photo Corp. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 11:43 pm
John Wiley??? [read post]
21 Sep 2013, 7:10 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., No. 11 Civ. 1416, 2013 WL 1285153, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 7:43 am
Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. (2002) and John Wiley & Sons v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 11:35 am
Publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc. owned the copyright on eight of those textbooks. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 11:03 am
See John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 9:21 pm
Plaintiffs American Institute of Physics, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., and Wiley Periodicals, Inc. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:47 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., which was argued last October and presents the question of whether the “first sale doctrine” under the Copyright Act applies to copyrighted works made and legally purchased outside the United States and then imported into the United States. [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:06 am
(Source: Good Little Robot)The legislative position is not any different, according to the Court, from the common law position as set out in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons (discussed more here), which restricted the rights in items that have been sold (albeit in relation to copyright and not patent rights). [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 12:26 am
Last Monday the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued their decision in John Wiley & Sons, Inc v Supap Kirtsaeng which examined the status of the first sale doctrine following Omega v Costco. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 10:23 am
The Court here conducts a thorough discussion of the seminal case in this area, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 8:51 am
— John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2011, 12:46 am
For more information, see: From Assets to Profits: Competing for IP Value and Return (Intellectual Property-General, Law, Accounting & Finance, Management, Licensing, Special Topics) by Bruce Berman (John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 2008). [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 11:36 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., No. 15-375, is a copyright case on the question of attorney's fees for a prevailing defendant. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 4:41 am
Commc'ns Workers of Am., 475 U.S. 643, 649, 106 S.Ct. 1415, 89 L.Ed.2d 648 (1986))); John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 10:19 am
Dec. 3, 2013) (in parallel with American Institute of Physics, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and Wiley Periodicals, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:52 pm
The brief comes as a response to a recent decision by the Second Circuit to limit the protections under Section 109 of the Copyright Act to works created within the United States in John Wiley & Sons v. [read post]
