Search for: "John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,"
Results 81 - 100
of 298
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2016, 9:31 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 133 S. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 6:00 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. supporting a flexible approach to awarding attorneys’ fees. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 5:43 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 133 S. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:12 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., the Supreme Court ruled that the Copyright Act’s “first sale” doctrine permitted an authorized purchaser of a copy of a work to resell that copy regardless of where it is purchased. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:12 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., the Supreme Court ruled that the Copyright Act’s “first sale” doctrine permitted an authorized purchaser of a copy of a work to resell that copy regardless of where it is purchased. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 11:47 am
Clearing rights and permissions can be both costly and time consuming. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 11:47 am
Clearing rights and permissions can be both costly and time consuming. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 11:47 am
You hate clearing permissions. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 11:47 am
Clearing rights and permissions can be both costly and time consuming. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 11:47 am
Clearing rights and permissions can be both costly and time consuming. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 12:41 pm
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 133 S. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 2:34 pm
John Wiley & Sons. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 1:45 pm
John Wiley &Sons, Inc., 133 S. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 12:08 pm
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 133 S. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 15-375, which concerns the standard for prevailing parties to obtain attorney’s fees under the Copyright Act; Encino Motorcars, LLC v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 8:39 pm
On January 15, 2016, the Supreme Court agreed to hear a case which requests that the Supreme Court determine the proper standard for attorneys’ fees awards in copyright cases.[1] The party requesting review by the Supreme Court, Kirstsaneg (“Petitioner”) prevailed against Respondent, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 2:17 am
Customer Tees, Inc., 879 F.Supp. 1200 (N.D. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 15-375, sequel to the successful case of that name from October Term 2012, wants to establish what the Copyright Act standard is for prevailing parties to obtain attorney’s fees. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:30 am
http://t.co/qIisfUtxY5 -> District Court Rejects Plaintiffs' Narrow Construction of the Term “User” under DMCA https://t.co/t04II91AdL -> The Copyright License As a Property Right http://t.co/5OSSPV9wwo -> Lin to decision in Minden Pictures, Inc. v. [read post]
