Search for: "John or Jane Does #1-3" Results 61 - 80 of 284
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2023, 9:29 am by Eugene Volokh
" {These conditions are: (1) Places the student in reasonable fear of harm to the student's person or property. (2) Has a substantially detrimental effect on the student's physical or mental health. (3) Has the effect of substantially interfering with a student's academic performance. (4) Has the effect of substantially interfering with the student's ability to participate in or benefit from the services, activities, or privileges provided by a school.} [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 7:50 pm by Larry
The opinion was written by visiting Senior Circuit Judge John Minor Wisdom. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 11:40 am by Petrelli Previtera, LLC
In contrast, consider a scenario where Jane and John, a couple married for 10 years, decide to separate. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 12:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
In the interests of space, I'll skip items 1 and 2 (though you can read them in the opinion), and focus on item 3: The above allegations taken together sufficiently allege background indicia of sex discrimination. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 9:11 am
John Does et al California Central District Court Filed: February 28, 2008 Plaintiff: Bandmerch, LLC Defendant: John Does, Jane Does, XYZ Company Case Number: 2:2008cv01379 Realty World, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 12:27 pm by Cappetta Law Offices
  Put differently, if John owns item X and Jane takes item X without John’s consent and ultimately destroys it, Jane is liable under the theory of conversion. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Matthew Kahn
Most histories of the 25th Amendment begin in the moments after President John F. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 4:05 pm by admin
An example would be “John and Jane Doe Revocable Trust dated 10/11/12. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 10:45 am by Jeffrey P. Hermes
For example, suppose candidate John Smith were to claim that his opponent, incumbent Jane Doe, "would be in favor of budget measures that would cost individual taxpayers up to $3,000. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:12 am by Jordan Brunner, Amira Mikhail
Four of the plaintiffs (Paul Harrison, two John Does, and a Jane Doe) claim that Section 2(c) of the E.O. will “prolong their separation from their loved ones,” by preventing them from obtaining visas, while “several” of the plaintiffs claim that the anti-Muslim animus in the executive caused them “feelings of disparagement and exclusion. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
The first seven counts involved allegations of sexual assault against Jane Doe I, a.k.a. [read post]
21 May 2018, 12:12 pm by David J. Halberg, Esq.
Jurors found defendant 3 percent negligent, while apportioning 97 percent of fault to the John Doe defendant, awarding plaintiff $108,000 in damages. [read post]
21 May 2018, 12:12 pm by David J. Halberg, Esq.
Jurors found defendant 3 percent negligent, while apportioning 97 percent of fault to the John Doe defendant, awarding plaintiff $108,000 in damages. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 7:36 am by Kyle Persaud
Suppose Mary Doe writes a will that says, “I leave, to my daughter, Jane Doe, all of the items that are in my garage at the time of my death. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 1:49 pm by John Elwood
Petitioner John Doe, a minor, by and through his parents Jack and Jane Doe, seeks “sexual orientation change efforts” (“SOCE”) counseling to treat his “unwanted same-sex attractions. [read post]