Search for: "John v. Harrison"
Results 41 - 60
of 246
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am
The main residence of Veraton, circa 1907. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 6:47 am
Miller, Getting into Equity Seth Davis, Empire in Equity Kellen Funk, Equity's Federalism John Harrison, Federal Judicial Power and Federal Equity Without Federal Equity Powers Andrew Kull, Equity's Atrophy Michael T. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 8:30 am
Hayes (1976) and John Quincy Adams (1824). [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 8:00 am
Rooney v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 8:45 pm
Compare Bray, supra, at 438 n.121; and John Harrison, Section 706 of the Administrative Procedure Act Does Not Call for Universal Injunctions or Other Universal Remedies, 37 Yale J. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 11:39 am
Compare Bray, supra, at 438 n.121; and John Harrison, Section 706 of the Administrative Procedure Act Does Not Call for Universal Injunctions or Other Universal Remedies, 37 Yale J. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 2:06 am
“John Doe” v. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 6:51 pm
Aaron Nielson has a fascinating post at the Notice and Comment blog on Arizona v. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 6:30 am
In Collins v. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
" And from Judge John Gerrard in Brock v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 5:24 pm
Supreme Court has posted online the transcript and audio of today’s oral argument in Carson v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 5:03 am
That's because "the State of Texas," when it shows up in court, is the State qua litigant—the executive power of the State, those officials with the legal right (as John Harrison describes) to put forth the government's resources to achieve the government's goals. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 4:08 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 5:11 pm
It matters what the injunction is and what it's supposed to do, because–as John Harrison has shown–the remedies under the APA are supposed to be the ordinary remedies. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 7:11 pm
In the APA context, I think the gold standard for analysis on what it means for courts to "set aside" rules are John Harrison's arguments made here. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 12:05 am
And Collins v. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 4:42 am
Bailey took it all the way to the Supreme Court and Sheppard v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 12:40 pm
That's good, and it's notable because of John Harrison's recent arguments that "set aside" isn't even a remedy at all. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 2:59 pm
Judge Bush cites the writings of Randy Barnett, Lawrence Solum, Michael McConnell, Nathan Chapman, Will Baude, Evan Bernick, Ilan Wurman, John Harrison, and many other prominent originalists. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 4:37 pm
This was a libel action over a website article dubbing reporter John Ware’s Panorama programme into anti-Semitism in the Labour party “rogue journalism”. [read post]
