Search for: "Johnson & Johnson Company Corporation"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,958
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2012, 1:52 pm
This Article from the Wharton School of Business does an excellent analysis of the string of recalls and what it may be doing to their corporate image: Patients versus Profits at Johnson & Johnson: Has the Company Lost its Way? [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 8:19 am
Many of the cuts will come from management levels as the company revises its corporate structure. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 11:54 am
At last, the pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson has agreed to pay $158 million to the state of Texas on claims that the company “overcharged” Medicaid and “illegally promoted” the antipsychotic drug Risperdal. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:49 am
Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder Asbestos Worries Uncovered According to memos from executives at Johnson & Johnson, the link between talcum powder and asbestos has been a concern in the company for decades. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 11:25 am
The company gave that scientist the highest science award offered by Johnson & Johnson in the year 2000, “for the Invention of the Thebaine Alkaloid ‘Norman’ Poppy. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 2:27 pm
Johnson & Johnson will stop selling its popular talc-based baby powder globally starting next year, according to a corporate statement released in August. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 12:42 pm
We can hold large companies responsible Sometimes, the only thing that can make a gigantic corporation like Johnson & Johnson stand accountable for their negligence that causes harm to their consumers is by filing suit – either in an individual case or by combining suits together into a class action case. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 10:04 am
Johnson & Johnson was rocked at the end of 2018 by Reuters reporting that analyzed thousands of pages of internal company documents that appeared to show executives with the corporation knew for decades about positive tests for carcinogens in its talcum powder products. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 3:31 pm
The asbestos lawsuit names cosmetics and pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson, its talc supplier Imerys Talc USA, Rite Aid Corporation, and Walgreen Co. as defendants and seeks compensation for the victim’s injuries. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 11:55 am
As a company, they are bound to protect their corporate image for the sake of future sales and market share. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 6:25 am
On July 14, 2021, the corporation Johnson & Johnson issued a voluntary recall on five sunscreen products manufactured by Neutrogena and Aveeno, two of the company's subsidiaries. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 6:51 am
In fact, this is among the major incentives for liable corporations to settle such cases short of trial. [read post]
15 May 2014, 2:11 pm
Juries are clearly finding in many cases that the company acted wrongfully, and that these actions had real consequences for patients affected by the bad products that Johnson & Johnson sold to the public. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 8:27 am
The SEC requires public companies like Johnson & Johnson to file a Form 10Q quarterly report every three months. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 7:26 am
Well, you could view it as a multi-national corporation picking on a charity. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 11:16 am
Not only did the company market the product to parents with newborns but also to women. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 11:16 am
Not only did the company market the product to parents with newborns but also to women. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:23 am
Dow Chemical Company DuPont Eastman Chemical Company Electronics for Imaging Eli Lilly and Company Exxon Mobil Corporation General Electric General Mills Genzyme GlaxoSmithKline Henkel Corporation Hoffman-La Roche Illinois Tool Works Inc. [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:30 pm
This latest requirement from the federal regulatory agency comes on the heels of other legal troubles faced by the corporation. [read post]
5 May 2017, 12:13 pm
Moreover, it was alleged Johnson & Johnson actively sought to conceal the known dangers by disseminating outdated or misleading information to the public, and internal documents showed that Johnson & Johnson was advised by a consultant that the company had made “outright false,” “inaccurate” and “questionable” statements about the risk of long-term exposure to talc. [read post]
