Search for: "Johnson v. Holder" Results 1 - 20 of 360
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2024, 8:38 am by Eric Goldman
George falsely represented [in the takedown request] that she was the copyright holder of the song. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 1:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Property v. property: TM v. domain names; land v. chattels; IP v. consumer goods. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  For present purposes, however, the important point to understand is that Trump’s primary merits argument, to which he devotes the first 13 pages of the Argument section of his brief (pp. 20-33), concerns only the second, middle “Officials Clause,” which identifies the current and former office-holders to whom Section 3 potentially applies, rather than the government positions that an insurrectionist or rebel is ineligible to occupy going forward. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am by John Elwood
But the plan treats holders of insured and uninsured asbestos personal-injury claims differently. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 2:21 am by Kurt R. Karst
  There, Plaintiffs (a mother individually and on behalf of her child) alleged that Defendants Johnson & Johnson and Walmart failed to include a warning on acetaminophen products they sold pursuant to the relevant OTC monograph, as well as under NDAs, that use of acetaminophen while pregnant causes children to be born with autism spectrum disorder and ADHD. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:32 am by Patricia Hughes
The test in Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm by Norman L. Eisen
On Thursday, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals held a hearing on whether Rep. [read post]