Search for: "Johnson v. Superintendent" Results 61 - 76 of 76
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2011, 2:58 am by Marie Louise
Easton Enterprises (Patently-O) (IPBiz) (Reexamination Alert) District Court E D Texas: Jury verdict against Johnson & Johnson & Cordis of $482 million in case brought by Saffran (EDTexweblog.com) District Court N D Oklahoma: Tribal sovereign immunity shields Indian nation from liability for patent infringement: Specialty House of Creation, Incorporated v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:07 am by Peter (Pete) A. Steinmeyer
Johnson served as the Inspector General and Superintendent of Police for the Town of Cicero, Illinois from February 2003 to April 2005. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 2:39 am
Niagara Front trans autLast Act: 03/10/09 REFERRED TO CIVIL SERVICE & PENSIONSS3054 SEWARD -- Authorizes peace officers designated by the superintendent of insurance to execute arrest and search warrants No Same asBLURB : CP L. peace officer execute warrtLast Act: 03/10/09 REFERRED TO CODESS3107 KRUGER -- Relates to the timeliness of commencing certain civil actions related to sex offenses Same as A 5708 BLURB : CP L. infancy statutes of limitatLast Act: 03/10/09… [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 7:01 am
Family Voices is also very involved in sharing information about CHIP, to policymakers as well as families, though their involvement on the CHIP board and the Robert Wood Johnson Covering Kids project. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 8:31 am
Kenosha County, 391 F.3d 837, 842 (7th Cir. 2004); see also Johnson v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 7:22 am
John Tuohy of the Indianapolis Star writes today about the Court of Appeals ruling April 30th in the case of Indiana State Board of Education v. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
Member Schaumber also found it unnecessary to pass on these unfair labor practices found by his colleagues: Supervisor Margeret Johnson's alleged coercive interrogation and threat of job loss of employees Mullanix-Ackerman and Williams; Supervisor Denise Miller's alleged coercive interrogation of Mullanix-Ackerman; and Barroso's threatening employees with unspecified reprisals. [read post]