Search for: "Jonathan Forbes"
Results 81 - 100
of 227
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2016, 2:53 am
Amy Howe analyzes the argument for this blog; more argument coverage comes from Adam Liptak in The New York Times and Daniel Fisher in Forbes. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 9:22 am
Jonathan Glick at Re/Code called these programs “platishers”, a portmanteau of “platform” and “publisher. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 9:05 pm
[Michael Greve, Jonathan Adler, Daniel Fisher first and second on Bank Markavi v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:06 pm
Savage and Molly Hennessy-Fiske of the Los Angeles Times, Mark Sherman of the Associated Press, Chris Geidner of Buzzfeed, Josh Gerstein and Kimberly Hefling of Politico, Greg Stohr of Bloomberg, Cristian Farias of Huffington Post, Debra Cassens Weiss of ABA Journal, Bill Mears of Fox News, Mark Walsh of Education Week, and Daniel Fisher of Forbes. [read post]
31 May 2016, 3:05 pm
Commentary on the opinion comes from Jonathan Adler for The Volokh Conspiracy, Tara Golshan of Vox, Seth Jaffe for Law & The Environment, and Lisa Soronen for IMLA. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 2:04 pm
Early commentary comes from Jonathan Adler at The Washington Post and Matt Ford at The Atlantic. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:48 am
” Briefly: At Liberty Blog, Jonathan Wood looks back at last week’s oral argument in U.S. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 12:49 pm
I also listed this book in my Forbes article with this to say about it: “How big business gets done in China. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 11:18 am
In a symbolic show of force, the United States dispatched “a small armada” to patrol the disputed waters of the South China Sea, according to the Navy Times. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 2:28 pm
Ilya Shapiro echoes that argument for at Forbes. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
The tax collectors should too | Jonathan Freedland https://t.co/bqlOn020x5 -> FCA reverses decision on recovery of T24 royalties Rogers v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
John Reed Stark David Fontaine In this day and age, the members of the boards of directors of most companies understand that cybersecurity issues are both important and should be a board-level priority. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:24 pm
Savage of the Los Angeles Times, Sam Baker at National Journal, Sam Hananel of the Associated Press, Chris Geidner of Buzzfeed, Brian Mahoney and Josh Gerstein of Politico, Greg Stohr of Bloomberg, William Bigelow of Breitbart, Tierney Sneed at Talking Points Memo, and Jonathan Walsh at National Review. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 9:05 pm
[George Leef, Forbes] Tags: administrative law, Donald Trump, First Amendment, free speech, jury nullification, nastygrams, TurkeyFree speech roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 4:58 am
I actually had a chance to meet with Jonathan and Sky in NYC last month to hear about their big plans for China Film Insider. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 10:44 am
Jonathan M. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am
News); and from Michael Bobelian of Forbes. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 9:05 pm
Natural experiment in greater Dallas area on whether fracking is good for local land values or not [Peter Van Doren, Cato] Inclusionary zoning drives up housing costs, allowing greater density would be better way to serve interests of poor [Scott Beyer] “The ‘Plan Bay Area’: Restricting Housing Development Isn’t Reform” [Jonathan Wood and Randal O’Toole, Forbes/Cato] “Poorly argued, destructive in intent”: Vatican’s… [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:36 pm
Mello at Stanford Lawyer, Nina Owcharenko at The Daily Signal, Amy Davidson at The New Yorker, Kenneth Jost at Jost on Justice, Peter Suderman at Hit & Run Blog, Bruce Japsen at Forbes, Michael Bobelian at Forbes, Daniel Fisher at Forbes and again at Forbes, Michael Dorf at Dorf on Law, Garrett Epps at The Atlantic, Eric J. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:40 am
” In an op-ed at Forbes, Ilya Shapiro looks at “who wins if the justices rule” in favor of the challengers, while at New York Magazine Cristian Farias urges Chief Justice John Roberts to let the “elected rather than the unelected respond for the political consequences of Obamacare. [read post]
