Search for: "Jones v. Kansas, State of et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2016, 11:26 pm
National Science Foundation and Kansas State University (10th Cir., May 19, 2016) (remanding [implicitly reversing] Foundation rejection of Craine's claim that his termination by the University was retaliation; the court reprimanded the Foundation for its failure to provide any analysis for its decision)Workers Compensation/Occupational Safety and DiseaseInjured Workers Association of Utah, et al., v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:42 pm
Hittle, et al. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 1:36 pm
Suppes et al [WD Mo], before Judge Scott O. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:15 am
., et. al. v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 12:08 pm
The case, Halbig et al v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 5:26 am
United States, et al. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am
Massey Coal Company, Inc., et al., the Court’s 2009 judicial recusal case. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 6:03 am
LaFave, et al., Criminal Procedure § 19.2(e) (4th ed. 2015). [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 2:31 am
http://j.st/pj6 Boroski, et al. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
[et al.]. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:40 am
[Disclosure: Howe & Russell represented respondents Irvin Muchnick et al. in the case.] [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
[ET AL.] [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
[ET AL.] [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 2:08 am
., et al. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
(relisted after the October 26 conference) CTIA-The Wireless Association, et al. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 10:14 pm
., v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm
Easton Enterprises et al (CAFC 2010-1057, -1116) precedential Tokai didn't get evidence in because of procedural error: failure to submit written reports for its experts, Jones and Sung. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 11:06 pm
Jones. 1981. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
John Deere Co. of Kansas City, 383 US 1 (1966) At the outset it must be remembered that the federal patent power stems from a specific constitutional provision which authorizes the Congress “To promote the Progress of . . . useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to . . . [read post]
