Search for: "Jones v. The City of New York et al" Results 1 - 20 of 70
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
Distressingly, criminal cases in Ontario are only dismissed for “excessive” delay when they fail to reach trial within thirty months[12] (which is three times longer than it takes on average for similar felonies to be resolved in New York City, which is itself above the statewide target of 180 days[13]). [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am by Joel R. Brandes
  In Anderson v Anderson, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2023 WL 8246131, 2023 N.Y. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 11:41 pm by Frank Cranmer
Philip Jones, Ecclesiastical Law: Cathedral Cities: England and Wales. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am by David Kopel
This post lists all the sources cited by the majority opinion in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 5:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
On or about January 28, 2016, plaintiff commenced a personal injury action in this Court styled Hazel Carasco v City of New York, Consolidated Edison Company, and Halcyon Construction Company, et. al., under Ind. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
New Zealand On 12 December 2019 Clark J handed down judgment in the defamation and privacy case of Driver v Radio New Zealand Limited [2019] NZHC 3275. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 5:08 am by Marty Lederman
  (Although Clayton County is a government entity, Bostock for some reason did not bring a constitutional claim under the Fourteenth Amendment--his allegations were limited to Title VII.)Donald Zarda, an openly gay man, worked as a skydiving instructor for Altitude Express, Inc., a New York company doing business on Long Island. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized… [read post]