Search for: "Julie B. Taylor"
Results 61 - 80
of 317
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2020, 8:00 am
” Taylor v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 8:30 pm
National/Federal 12 Votes Separated These House Candidates. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 1:55 am
Key Findings Introduction Temporary Tax Policy The Remaining Extenders Expiring Provisions under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Pandemic-Related Expirations Conclusion Appendix Key Findings At the end of 2020, 33 temporary tax provisions are scheduled to expire at the federal level. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 10:34 am
• B. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 2:32 pm
(relisted after the Sept. 29 and Oct. 9 conferences) Taylor v. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 7:01 am
On July 13, Secretary Pompeo declared that China’s “claims to offsh [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:58 am
Case No. 516427 (July 15, 2008); Woodard v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 6:02 am
Greenberg and Christopher B. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 6:15 am
Posted by Taylor B. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
John Lewis and aimed to include photos of themselves with the civil rights icon who died on July 17. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 2:00 am
Taylor, No. 19-CV-4988 (C.P. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 5:51 am
Schwarcz (Duke University), on Monday, July 13, 2020 Tags: Bailouts, Banks, CARES Act, COVID-19, Financial crisis, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, Macroeconomics, Systemic risk Chancery Court Sustains Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims Against Nonparty to LLC Agreement Posted by Taylor B. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 6:14 am
Posted by Taylor B. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 5:01 am
The United States faces a growing terrorism problem from the far right and white supremacists. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:58 am
Posted by Edward B. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 6:25 am
Posted by Taylor B. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 2:47 pm
Jen Patja Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast featuring a conversation with Nate Persily, the James B. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:50 am
Key Findings In nearly two of every three households in America with dependents, more than one person works to make ends meet. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
Employee B, however, was permanently appointed on March 1 of the same year, while Employee A was permanently appointed a month later, on April 1.Under the terms of the Local 788 collective bargaining agreement A would have greater seniority for layoff purposes than B. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
Employee B, however, was permanently appointed on March 1 of the same year, while Employee A was permanently appointed a month later, on April 1.Under the terms of the Local 788 collective bargaining agreement A would have greater seniority for layoff purposes than B. [read post]
