Search for: "Julie Nicklin" Results 81 - 100 of 204
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  Kennedy v National Trust for Scotland, heard 25 and 26 July 2018 (Sharp, Asplin LJJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
On 26 July 2022, Nicklin J determined the meaning of the article as follows (Dyson v MGN Ltd [2022] EWHC 2469 (QB) at [21]): “(a) the Claimant had publicly supported the benefits of Brexit to British industry, yet following Brexit he had moved the global head office of his business to Singapore. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am by INFORRM
On 26 October 2023, the Online Safety Act received royal assent. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am by INFORRM
The rules will be published in the Colorado Register later this month and will go into effect on 1 July 2023, when the CPA takes effect. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
As mentioned above, on 18 May 2022 Nicklin J refused trial by jury in the case of Blake and others v Fox. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
On 16 June 2022, there were hearings in the cases of MBR Acres v others before Nicklin J and GJE v FJV before Collins Rice J. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
On 7 June HHJ Parkes QC heard an application in the long running case of Otuo v Watch Tower Bible & Tract Society (originally issued in July 2013). [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am by INFORRM
The Sun has apologised to Paul Seeley, an officer with a law enforcement agency, and paid him damages for an article published on 14 July 2021. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
The court upheld the trial decision of Nicklin J that defences of truth, honest opinion and public interest did not succeed. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 27 and 28 and 30 November 2018 Nicklin J heard the privacy trial in ZXC v Bloomberg. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 19 November 2018 Nicklin J heard the second PTR in the privacy case of ZXC v Bloomberg. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm by INFORRM
A stay of the proceedings was granted in respect of the claims that were not struck out (as bound to fail or an abuse of process) pending payment by the Claimant of the costs he was ordered to pay in the 1 July 2020 Order made in the 2020 Claim. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 5:31 pm by INFORRM
The House of Lords begins the Committee Stage of the Data Protection Bill on 30 October 2017. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
On 31 October 2017 Nicklin J handed down judgment in the case of Brown v Bower ([2017] EWHC 2637 (QB)), (heard 17 October 2017). [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
Lachaux v Independent Print, heard 13 and 14 November 2018 (UKSC) ZXC v Bloomberg, heard 27-28 and 30 November 2018 (Nicklin J) R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal, heard 3 and 4 December 2018 (UKSC) Ali v Channel 5, heard 4 December 2018 (Irwin, Newey and Baker LJJ). [read post]
27 May 2018, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
 The legal vacation is only 8 days, with the Trinity legal term beginning on 4 June 2018 and ending on 31 July 2018. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
Policing Minister, Chris Philp unveiled plans at the Conservative Party Conference this week to allow the police to use passports, the police national database and the immigration and asylum biometric system in order to catch criminals. [read post]
9 May 2022, 1:35 am by INFORRM
On 5 May 2022, there was a hearing in the case of Hamblin v News Group Newspapers Limited before Nicklin J On 6 May 2022, there was a hearing in the case of Hijazi v Yaxley Lennon before Nicklin J. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
On 14 February 2019 Nicklin J heard the trial in Greenstein v Campaign against Antisemitism, giving judgment on 15 February 2019. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
Google has won its appeal in the Supreme Court in Lloyd v Google, with a unanimous judgement that rejected the Court of Appeal’s ruling that compensation can be awarded for “loss of control” of personal data by reason of any non-trivial contravention of the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA 1998), without the need to prove facts relating to specific individuals. [read post]