Search for: "Justice John Paul Stevens"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,658
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
Irving John Selikoff registered for the draft, in Port Chester, New York. 1941. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:00 am
” Then-Justice John Paul Stevens added his liberal voice against such programs, noting that Richmond’s law “encompasses persons who have never been in business in Richmond as well as minority contractors who may have been guilty of discriminating against members of other minority groups. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 12:44 pm
In his 2019 memoir, the late Justice John Paul Stevens expanded on his earlier admission that his majority opinion included a serious misreading of precedent (though he continued to believe that the Court got the bottom-line result right). [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
Andrew Koppelman, John Paul Stevens Professor of Law at Northwestern University, is the author of Burning Down the House: How Libertarian Philosophy Was Corrupted by Delusion and Greed(St. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 12:01 am
” According to Supreme Court Associate Justice John Paul Stevens, who sat in the gallery and watched Marshall argue the case before the court on January 8, 1948, Marshall was “respectful, forceful and persuasive – so persuasive that on the following Monday – only four days after the argument – the Court unanimously ruled in Sipuel’s favor. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 5:44 am
You can add Abe Laeser, John Hogan, Richard Shiffrin, David Gilbert, Bill Howell, Lenny Glick, Kevin DiGregory, Reid Ruben, Howard Rosen, Paul Mendelson, and a host of others who would do the same. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 7:54 am
Justice John Paul Stevens, writing for the Court, opined that “the Act is intended to serve genuine, substantial, and legitimate public interests in health, the environment, and the fiscal integrity of the area by minimizing damage to surface areas. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 7:14 pm
If he remains on the court until he is 90, the age at which Justice John Paul Stevens retired, he will have been a justice for 47 years. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 5:09 am
Justice John Paul Stevens concluded that the act’s vague language posed serious First Amendment free-speech issues. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall, who owned slaves. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
[8] See Steven M. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 4:02 am
Missy Ryan, John Hudson and Paul Sonne report for the Washington Post. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
Chief Justice Roberts Temporarily Delays Release of Trump Tax Records MSN – Robert Barnes (Washington Post) | Published: 11/1/2022 Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts temporarily halted the release of former President Trump’s tax records to a congressional committee and called for more briefings in the case. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:32 pm
When the justices take the bench, Chief Justice John Roberts proceeds with the recently restored practice of in-courtroom bar admissions. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 4:37 pm
She was present in July 2019 when the late Justice John Paul Stevens, who succeeded Douglas in 1975, died and lay in repose in the Great Hall. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 1:35 pm
Steven Mazie Supreme Court correspondent at the Economist perceptive, gentle brilliant, kind and full of wit we will miss you Art! [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 1:33 pm
Justices Lewis Powell and John Paul Stevens look on. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
The spectacle of, say, Justice John Paul Stevens (whom I much admired) serving for 34 years until he retired at the age of 90, is unknown not only abroad, but even more to the point, everywhere else in the United States (save, perhaps, Rhode Island). [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm
As Justice John Paul Stevens wrote in a concurrence in a 1977 case involving restrictions on access to contraception, banning preventative measures to condemn activity they make safer is akin to expressing “disapproval of motorcycles by forbidding the use of safety helmets. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 9:08 pm
In 1980, the Supreme Court, by a vote of five to four—with only three other justices signing onto Justice John Paul Stevens’s plurality opinion—affirmed the Fifth Circuit’s ruling, reasoning that “the burden was on the Agency to show, on the basis of substantial evidence, that it is at least more likely than not that long-term exposure to 10 ppm of benzene presents a significant risk of material health impairment. [read post]
