Search for: "Justice Party (The)"
Results 41 - 60
of 59,311
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2024, 11:51 am
The Department believes that this rule will promote the efficient and expeditious adjudication of cases, afford immigration judges and the Board flexibility to efficiently allocate their limited resources, and protect due process for parties before immigration judges and the Board. [read post]
17 May 2024, 11:36 am
Ukraine Prompted a Rapprochement and Support for Justice The ICC’s prosecutor opened an investigation in Ukraine in March 2022. [read post]
17 May 2024, 11:36 am
Ukraine Prompted a Rapprochement and Support for Justice The ICC’s prosecutor opened an investigation in Ukraine in March 2022. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:34 am
” The bill was approved by a vote of 224 to 187, largely among party lines with only three Republicans voting against the bill and 16 Democrats voting in its favor. [read post]
17 May 2024, 5:45 am
Vietnam has been ruled by a one-party state since 1975. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
First, the UK Government has been exemplary in ensuring the “seamless continuity” of the HCCH 2005 Choice of Court Convention throughout the uncertainties of the whole withdrawal process, as evidenced by the UK’s declarations and Note Verbale to the depositary Kingdom of the Netherlands.[17] The same applies mutatis mutandis to the HCCH 1965 Service Convention, to which all EU Member States are parties, and the HCCH 1970 Evidence Convention, which has only been ratified so… [read post]
17 May 2024, 3:00 am
Justice Alito, friend of criminal defendants? [read post]
17 May 2024, 3:00 am
The Justice Department closed its investigation of Gaetz without filing charges. [read post]
16 May 2024, 10:30 pm
Thus, if the national court ex officio finds a contractual term to be unfair, it must notify the litigation parties thereof, and provide them with the opportunity to present their views and refute the views of the other party (para. 46). [read post]
16 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Individuals must hire a third party at their own expense, provide advance notice of a third party’s intent to attend, and appear in person at their appointment regardless of the third party’s presence. [read post]
16 May 2024, 7:00 pm
At oral argument, Justices Thomas and Alito seemed open to this interpretation of the statute. [read post]
16 May 2024, 5:40 pm
The Assembly Appropriations Committee removed language in AB 2125 authorizing parties to challenge justices who write or concur with opinions reversed by the state Supreme Court and remanded to the court of appeal for further action. [read post]
16 May 2024, 5:28 pm
In the criminal justice system, keeping track of a case status is important for all parties involved. [read post]
16 May 2024, 4:45 pm
Justice Sotomayor, writing for a unanimous Supreme Court, stated that Section 3 “creates an obligation impervious to judicial discretion. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:37 pm
Discussion at the argument suggested that the justices were skeptical about the practical consequences of dismissal, so Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s opinion for a unanimous court rejecting that option is no surprise. [read post]
Justice Department formally moves to reclassify marijuana as a less dangerous drug in historic shift
16 May 2024, 12:30 pm
The post Justice Department formally moves to reclassify marijuana as a less dangerous drug in historic shift appeared first on J&Y Law Firm. [read post]
Justice Department formally moves to reclassify marijuana as a less dangerous drug in historic shift
16 May 2024, 11:39 am
The post Justice Department formally moves to reclassify marijuana as a less dangerous drug in historic shift appeared first on J&Y Law Firm. [read post]
16 May 2024, 11:22 am
After all, appellate judges know (or should know) that a series of rulings that goes against one party is not proof of bias. [read post]
16 May 2024, 10:31 am
If you or a loved one has suffered from a sidewalk injury, taking prompt legal action can be the most effective step toward recovery and justice. [read post]
16 May 2024, 10:20 am
Several justices acknowledged they were worried that audio from the proceeding could be spliced up and used for political purposes. [read post]
