Search for: "Justice v. Michaels et al"
Results 41 - 60
of 580
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2010, 8:31 am
Michael Eakin and Max Baer voted to affirm the Superior Court's decision and Justices Saylor and Chief Justice Castille voted to reverse. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 3:00 am
Beaty, et al.; Republic of Iraq, et al., v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:32 am
0270 (DDB) (Justice Guzman not sitting) Betty Yvon Lesley, et al. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 3:19 am
Employment agreements Dillon, et al, v City of New York, 238 AD2d 302; Leave to appeal denied, 90 NY2d 811 Typically, an individual is given a letter of appointment upon initial employment setting out the effective date of appointment and other important facts such as title and salary. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 12:54 pm
Second Chance Body Armor, et al., No. 04-0280 (D.D.C.), setting forth the DOJ’s official position on the impact of the Supreme Court’s unanimous decision announced last week in Universal Health Services, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:03 am
The case is Morrison, et al., v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 10:26 am
G4S, Serco, Tesco, Stobart et al – if Grayling’s plans go through - will probably kill off the high street solicitor specialising in Crime, reduce the pool of lawyers available to the public (You won’t be able to choose your solicitor anyway and the criminal bar will be significantly reduced in number) and….. well let me leave the detail to two experienced barristers who express their views robustly in recent podcasts with me. [read post]
26 May 2013, 10:26 am
G4S, Serco, Tesco, Stobart et al – if Grayling’s plans go through - will probably kill off the high street solicitor specialising in Crime, reduce the pool of lawyers available to the public (You won’t be able to choose your solicitor anyway and the criminal bar will be significantly reduced in number) and….. well let me leave the detail to two experienced barristers who express their views robustly in recent podcasts with me. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:59 pm
So too during the oral argument: Justices Thomas, Alito, et al made so many spurious arguments that attempting to deal with them one by one feels like a sucker's game.Just to name a few lowlights:* Justice Thomas wanted to know whether he could use this case to invalidate Jack Smith's appointment. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 7:10 am
KENT, KIMBERLY, ET AL. | Questions Presented 06-1509 BOULWARE, MICHAEL H. [read post]
30 May 2009, 11:24 pm
The Case of CMS v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:14 pm
League of Women Voters, et al. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 10:47 am
Jeffrey McKinley and Heritage-WTI, Inc., et al., 2014-0795. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 7:15 am
Percival et al. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 2:15 pm
The Department of Justice announced the settlement on August 17, 2017, of two qui tam cases pending in the District of Massachusetts, United States, et al. ex rel. sanofi-aventis US LLC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 12:02 am
Michael Reisman & Mahnoush H. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 2:15 pm
The Department of Justice announced the settlement on August 17, 2017, of two qui tam cases pending in the District of Massachusetts, United States, et al. ex rel. sanofi-aventis US LLC v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 2:15 pm
The Department of Justice announced the settlement on August 17, 2017, of two qui tam cases pending in the District of Massachusetts, United States, et al. ex rel. sanofi-aventis US LLC v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:35 pm
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument at 10 a.m. next Monday in Free Enterprise Fund, et al., v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 1:16 pm
[et al.] [read post]
