Search for: "Justice v. Michaels et al" Results 81 - 100 of 581
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
The HawkTalk blog has published a list of omissions in the Ministry of Justice Human Rights consultation, including the absence of any consideration or analysis of the impact of the human rights proposals on the current UK_GDPR data protection regime in the UK or how they impact on data subjects (60 million in the UK alone them). [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 2:07 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Nessim MezrahiIn the following guest post, Nessim Mezrahi takes a detailed look at the factors driving D&O profitability and the securities class action loss mitigation steps insurers can take to improve profitability. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
Rosanna Smart et al., The Science of Gun Policy: A Critical Synthesis of Research Evidence on the Effects of Gun Policies in the United States. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 6:36 am by Jay R. McDaniel, Esq.
Dominic Thomas Karipaparambil, Plaintiff-Appellant, v Robert Michael Polus et al., Defendants-Respondents. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 1:53 pm by Emily Coward
Chauvin, et al., you would have been asked to complete a lengthy questionnaire including, in a section addressing bias in the criminal justice system, the following question: This was not the first time that Black Lives Matter has come up in jury selection, but it was perhaps the first time that potential jurors were asked their opinions on a movement that exploded exponentially and internationally by the very events they were summoned to review. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 4:00 am by Brooke MacKenzie
The Society has a duty to act so as to facilitate access to justice for the people of Ontario. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:20 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
First up will be the ACA's defenders, the intervenor states (California, et al.) and the House of Representatives, followed by the Solicitor General and the plaintiffs. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 11:09 am by Eugene Volokh
American Bar Association et al. could have led to discrimination against disabled law school faculty. [read post]