Search for: "Justice v. Tian"
Results 21 - 40
of 54
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2020, 12:30 am
| Keeping up with Dutch patent litigation: Half-year case law review 2020 | Beijing IP Court: let’s talk about short video copyrights | Rick Ross wins legal beef with 50 Cent: the Second Circuit holds that 50 Cent's Publicity Right claim is preempted by the Copyright Act | Copyright, Trademark, International IP, and Trespass: Imapizza LLC v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:02 am
When Sky v SkyKick leaves rightsholders in limbo.Event ReportAsia Correspondent Tian Liu provides her first report on The Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO)'s 2018 European Practice Committee Conference in Amsterdam: Report on IPO’s 2018 European Practice Committee Conference (1/2). [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 11:07 am
Tian Lu provided an overview of the Notice. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
An AIPPI Rapid Response Event I WIPO's statistics for 2016: Asia continues to roar I UK UPC ratification still on track despite Article 50 trigger I Does Mr Justice Arnold's decision in Teva v MSD show just how large a role patent law has come to play in assessing SPC validity? [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:35 am
I BREAKING: Unanimous Supreme Court in Samsung v Apple finds that damages may be based on a component, not whole product I Will Iceland's EU trade mark end up on ice? [read post]
24 May 2019, 8:38 am
Applicant Jen Chi sought to register its mark (right) within Class 25, and the application was opposed by Guess.Asia Correspondent Tian Lu looks at the EU's Protected Designations of Origin (PDOs) in Court of Justice: use of figurative signs may constitute unlawful evocation of a PDO.Events and Other NewsKatfriend Andrea Leonelli reports on the AIPPI event, where important cases such as Cartier v BT and Sky v SkyKick were discussed. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 11:18 am
Mr Justice Arnold found that Conversant's patent is essential and infringed by Huawei and ZTE, but invalid for added matter: Conversant v Huawei [2019] EWHC 1687 (Pat).Katfriend D. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 1:00 pm
Read why.Friday FantasiesInternKat Tian Lu summarizes the week’s news including the funded PhD positions being offered by the Center of Law & Economics at ETH Zurich.Fontem see their patent “vaporised” – the dangers of added matterGareth Holliday analyses Nicocigs v Fontem Holdings & Fontem Ventures, [2015] EWHC 2752 (Pat). [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 1:17 am
Alexandra Mezulanik, research assistant at UCL IBIL, examines the much anticipated decision in Martin v Kogan of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
Copyright trolling: Abusive litigation based on a GPL compliance discusses the monetary settlement reached outside the court in case of copyright trolling in Germany Book review Asia Correspondent Tian Lu reviews Dr. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 3:31 pm
: G 1/18, the decision | Coloplast v Salts: Should UK infringement proceedings be stayed if the patent has been opposed? [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 3:41 pm
Around the IP BlogsInternKats Cecilia Sbrolli and Tian Lu surfed about the IP blogosphere and returned with some very interesting articles for readers’ digestion and rumination.Photo courtesy of Wang Ti.PREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 157 [week ending Sunday 23 July] | Sky v SkyKick - no CJEU reference re removal of own name defence to EUTMs | An improved improver? [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 6:27 am
| Brussels court in FN Herstal v Heckler & Koch wrestles with combination invention v mere aggregation of features | Brexit: requests to Govt from IP professional bodies | Street heart: urban murals as common goods | Have your say on the UK implementation of the EUPortability Regulation: public consultation now open! [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:17 am
This Kat expects new foods.Trademark SpecialKat Tian Lu reports on the facepalm trade mark case in China, in which an applicant attempted to register an emoji created by Tencent as a trademark in China. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:18 am
| Retromark Volume III: the last six months in trade marks | An IPSOC Q&A with Mr Justice Birss | The EU Commission proposes new whistle-blowing rules: should IP and trade secret holders tremble? [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 1:06 pm
Philips v Asustek and HTCGuestKat Eibhlin Vardy cuts her patent litigation teeth on smartphones - She had a wave of nostalgia delving into the acronyms of mobile telecommunications standards in the recent Court of Appeal decision of Koninklijke Philips N.V. v Asustek Computer Incorporation, HTC Corporation and others [2017] EWCA Civ 1526. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 6:48 am
Never Too Late 183 [week ending 18 February] Mr Justice Carr's L'Oreal v RN Ventures decision bristles with warnings on Actavis v Lilly claim interpretation, equivalents and prosecution history (Parts I and II) | Can Wenzhou and cigarette lighters tell us something about why there are IP rights? [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 6:43 am
Asia Correspondent Tian Lv discussed the new legislation, as well as the plight of a celebrity vlogger battling trade mark squatters.A court in Belgium recently rule on a case about the usage of trade marks in artworks. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 12:39 pm
Image: by Tian [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 6:10 am
Then he linked it to several quite interesting and partially revolutionary judicial interpretations in the Court of Justice in relation to copyright issues, including SCF v. [read post]
