Search for: "K v C"
Results 41 - 60
of 3,089
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2011, 4:15 am
William K. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 8:06 am
This is thought to be the first claim brought in the UK for damages based on the cause of action developed by the ECJ in the case of Köbler v Republik Österreich (Case C-224/01).The claim concerned two judgments of the Court of Appeal of 1999 and 2000, in which the Council for the Protection of Rural England, of which the claimant was a trustee of the London branch, had been refused judicial review of decisions by local authorities in London (R. v London… [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 10:46 am
The Seventh Circuit’s opinion in Hecker v Deere is interesting in a number of ways, and on a number of levels. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 4:05 pm
Circuit, United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 3:09 pm
By Dennis Crouch Kimberly-Clark Worldwide v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 11:20 am
John C. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 7:32 am
" Reversing the Central District of California in the case of K and N Engineering, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 9:11 pm
Labin and Alena V. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 10:19 am
JURGENS n/k/a JOHANNEMANN v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 12:06 pm
§ § 1512(c)(2), 1512(k), and 2232(c).HELD: District court abused its discretion by not admitting defendant's proffered character evidence. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 7:45 am
Peters, p/k/a Vince P. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 12:51 pm
Law Lessons from TRACEY EMOLO (n/k/a TRACEY DEGROOT) V. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 3:30 am
Question 128D.17 – The fair value of an award that did not meet vesting conditions during the year because the performance or market conditions were not met, but for which there is still potential for the award to vest in the future, should not be subtracted under Item 402(v)(2)(iii)(C)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K because it failed to vest in the current year. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 2:37 am
Alfwear, Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 10:10 am
Jarvis v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 9:13 am
Additional Resources: Godwin v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 10:26 am
JURGENS n/k/a JOHANNEMANN v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 9:20 am
Unlike Enigma v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 1:06 pm
After taking into account the applicable rounding rules, the amounts for 2016 are as follows:The limitation under Section 402(g)(1) on the exclusion for elective deferrals described in Section 402(g)(3) remains unchanged at $18,000.The annual compensation limit under Sections 401(a)(17), 404(l), 408(k)(3)(C), and 408(k)(6)(D)(ii) remains unchanged at $265,000.The dollar limitation under Section 416(i)(1)(A)(i) concerning the definition of key employee in a… [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 2:36 pm
According the 2018 Lerbakken v. [read post]
