Search for: "K.B." Results 41 - 60 of 115
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2016, 6:06 pm by Justin A
See Twyne's Case, 3 Coke Rep. 80b, 76 Eng.Rep. 809 (K.B. 1601); O. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 6:25 am by scanner1
CIVIL – DEPENDENT NEGLECT DA 15-0549, 2016 MT 73, IN THE MATTER OF: K.B., A Youth in Need of Care. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 11:25 am
Rep. 807 K.B. (1765), was a major influence on the enactment of the Fourth Amendment, and I assign an edited version of the case in my Criminal Procedure class when we begin our study of search and seizure law. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 6:32 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
K.B., 663 N.W.2d 625, 633-34 (N.D. 2003); Yavapai-Apache Tribe, 906 S.W.2d at 169-71. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 6:14 am
These photos were taken before K.B. turned eighteen [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:27 pm by National Indian Law Library
(Trademarks)* State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/currentstate.htmCases featured:In the Matter of K.B. and T.B (Indian Child Welfare Act, notice of termination hearing)In the Interest of T.E.R. [read post]
16 May 2013, 11:11 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is the Montana Supreme Court’s ruling in In re K.B.: Opinion Excerpt: Mother appeared with counsel at the termination hearing and contested the termination of her parental rights, suggesting instead that the State be granted a long-term guardianship of the children. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 6:46 am by Giles Peaker
As Wandsworth found out, such extraneous terms, not directly bearing on the occupation of the property, are likely to be unenforceable, as per RMR Housing v Combs [1951] 1 K.B. 486However, if Yarlington’s assessment of the tenant’s progress against their ambition agreement is indeed a factor in deciding whether to grant a further tenancy at the end of the 7 years, this thing is serious. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 6:46 am by Giles Peaker
As Wandsworth found out, such extraneous terms, not directly bearing on the occupation of the property, are likely to be unenforceable, as per RMR Housing v Combs [1951] 1 K.B. 486However, if Yarlington’s assessment of the tenant’s progress against their ambition agreement is indeed a factor in deciding whether to grant a further tenancy at the end of the 7 years, this thing is serious. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:11 pm by NL
”At the hearing of the claim, the District Judge held: (a) cl.31, insofar as it applied to the entire borough, was not an “obligation of the tenant”, applying RMR Housing v Combs [1951] 1 K.B. 486 (b) insofar as it related to anything which was “local” to his flat then Wandsworth had failed to prove, as a matter of fact, that his ASB was in the area (c) in any event, it too was not an obligation of the tenancy (d) if he was wrong about that, it wasn’t… [read post]