Search for: "K.B." Results 61 - 80 of 115
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2021, 5:01 am by Stephen Halbrook
Rep. 75 (K.B. 1686), the prosecution charged Knight for "going or riding armed in affray of peace. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 11:15 am by Eugene Volokh
Henry, [1903] 2 K.B. 740,” and discussing this leading case at considerable length). [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:11 pm by NL
”At the hearing of the claim, the District Judge held: (a) cl.31, insofar as it applied to the entire borough, was not an “obligation of the tenant”, applying RMR Housing v Combs [1951] 1 K.B. 486 (b) insofar as it related to anything which was “local” to his flat then Wandsworth had failed to prove, as a matter of fact, that his ASB was in the area (c) in any event, it too was not an obligation of the tenancy (d) if he was wrong about that, it wasn’t… [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 12:10 pm
., K.B. and M.B., Children in Need of Services; J.B. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 6:46 am by Giles Peaker
As Wandsworth found out, such extraneous terms, not directly bearing on the occupation of the property, are likely to be unenforceable, as per RMR Housing v Combs [1951] 1 K.B. 486However, if Yarlington’s assessment of the tenant’s progress against their ambition agreement is indeed a factor in deciding whether to grant a further tenancy at the end of the 7 years, this thing is serious. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
., Hillsboro, 503-626-4788 or [www.computers-recycling.com]K.B. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 6:46 am by Giles Peaker
As Wandsworth found out, such extraneous terms, not directly bearing on the occupation of the property, are likely to be unenforceable, as per RMR Housing v Combs [1951] 1 K.B. 486However, if Yarlington’s assessment of the tenant’s progress against their ambition agreement is indeed a factor in deciding whether to grant a further tenancy at the end of the 7 years, this thing is serious. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 8:56 am
As to what constitutes constructive dismissal has been explained in an old English decision, In re Rubel Bronze and Metal Company and Vos, [1918] 1 K.B:"Dismissal may be effected by conduct as well as words. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 1:25 pm by Dennis Crouch
Rep. 1274, 1276 (K.B. 1787) (“[E]very patent is calculated to give a monopoly to the patentee . . . . [read post]
31 May 2020, 7:06 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
See also In re Rubel Bronze and Metal Co. and Vos, [1918] 1 K.B. 315, at p. 322. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 8:25 am by CMS
It was held that the previous judge was correct in stating that dishonesty could not properly be alleged by adding the knowledge of one innocent person to another (citing Armstrong v Strain [1952] 1 K.B 232 and Greenridge Luton One Ltd v Kempton Investments Ltd [2016] EWHC 91 (Ch)). [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:11 pm by NL
”At the hearing of the claim, the District Judge held: (a) cl.31, insofar as it applied to the entire borough, was not an “obligation of the tenant”, applying RMR Housing v Combs [1951] 1 K.B. 486 (b) insofar as it related to anything which was “local” to his flat then Wandsworth had failed to prove, as a matter of fact, that his ASB was in the area (c) in any event, it too was not an obligation of the tenancy (d) if he was wrong about that, it wasn’t… [read post]
14 May 2009, 3:12 pm
Such a decision could only be reached if the Judge considered the effect on both the landlord and tenant of making and not making the order (see Cresswell v Hodgson [1951] 2 K.B. 92) The Judge had erred by posing the question merely in terms of balancing competing interests. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 10:51 pm by The Legal Blog
Price (1909) 1 K.B. 7; affirmed (1909) 2 K.B. 724, cited Party Liable, where it was held that parole evidence is admissible to prove the contents of a written acknowledgement which has been lost; see now Limitation Act, 1939, Sections 23,24. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 4:28 am
Readers may remember the case of Ed Sheeran and Sam Chokri, discussed by this Kat back in August 2018 here. [read post]