Search for: "KATHRYN WERDEGAR, California Supreme Court Justice" Results 41 - 60 of 71
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2011, 11:26 am
The California Supreme Court unanimously determined they must be paid overtime, with Justice Kathryn Werdegar writing, "To permit nonresidents to work in California without the protection of our overtime law would completely sacrifice, as to those employees, the state's important public policy goals of protecting health and safety and preventing the evils associated with overwork. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 6:11 pm
" On behalf of the court, Justice Kathryn Mickle Werdegar wrote: "Not to apply California law would also encourage employers to substitute lower paid temporary employees from other states for California employees, thus threatening California's legitimate interest in expanding the job market. [read post]
11 May 2011, 8:46 am by Mark Miller, Associate
As pointed out by the two dissenting justices, Justices Kathryn Mickle Werdegar and Carlos Moreno, the majority’s decision allows police “carte blanche, with no showing of exigency, to rummage at leisure through the wealth of personal and business information that can be carried on a mobile phone or handheld computer merely because the device was taken from an arrestee’s person. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 2:35 pm by Brad Pauley
This month’s Los Angeles Lawyer contains an article reviewing the California Supreme Court’s several recent decisions interpreting the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 11:18 am by Nancy Lanard
In a stunning decision, the California Supreme Court ruled on Monday that a police officer can search the contents of a cell phone during an arrest and without a warrant. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 1:37 pm by SOIssues
Dissenting Justice Kathryn Werdegar raised similar concerns in her opinion. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 3:01 am by SHG
  That was all the California Supreme Court needed to conclude that police do not require a warrant to search a cellphone.From the SFGate: Under U.S. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 6:56 am
Justice Kathryn Werdegar, writing for the majority, held that the ban on giving preferential treatment in the awarding of public contracts under the Article I, Section 31 of the California Constitution [text] did not violate the Equal Protection Clause [Cornell LII backgrounder] of the US Constitution. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 3:00 am
Kennard, Kathryn Mickle Werdegar, and Carol A. [read post]
25 May 2010, 4:32 pm by Cal Law
[Mike McKee]Jolly Ron George showed up at the California Supreme Court today. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 2:15 pm by Cal Law
Chief Justice Ronald George, who introduced the court at the lunch, was joined by Justices Kathryn Werdegar, Ming Chin and Marvin Baxter. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 10:50 pm
Ron George, the 27th Chief Justice of the California Supreme Court, lives in... wait for it... [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 12:10 am
The San Francisco Chronicle reports that the California Supreme Court, over the dissent of Justice Kathryn Mickle Werdegar, has refused to review the court of appeals decision in Doe v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 8:45 am
Werdegar was appointed to the California Supreme Court by Governor Pete Wilson on May 3, 1994. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 10:43 am
The 7-member California Supreme Court, which voted 4-3 last May that same-sex couples had a right to marry under the California Constitution, heard arguments on March 5 about whether a slim majority of the voters on November 4 had validly amended the state's Constitution to change that result by approving Proposition 8. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 8:28 am
In an email, Supreme Court Justice Kathryn Mickle Werdegar said she might have been interested "in theory, but since I was not, in fact, going to do so, I was not required to weigh any interest I may have had against the impact of my doing so. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 1:15 am
Supreme Court Justice Kathryn Werdegar handled duties in the Assembly. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 5:48 pm
Justice Kathryn Mickle Werdegar wrote, “the law’s protection against retaliation is illusory. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 12:11 am
" California Supreme Court Chief Justice Ronald George and Associate Justice Kathryn Werdegar both seem to think so. [read post]