Search for: "KING PHARMACEUTICALS, INC."
Results 121 - 140
of 211
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2012, 8:11 am
Qui Tam means that a person files a lawsuit for the king and also for him or herself. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 1:41 pm
Qui Tam means that a person files a lawsuit for the king and also for him or herself. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 3:16 pm
Qui Tam means that a person files a lawsuit for the king and also for him or herself. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 7:56 am
The civil suit accused the company, which is 41 percent owned by Goldman Sachs Group Inc. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 7:25 am
Qualcomm Inc., reversing the district court’s judgment in favor of the FTC. [read post]
25 May 2015, 4:15 am
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 46 [week ending on Sunday 17 May] – Whyte & MacKay Ltd v Origin Wine UK Ltd and Dolce Co Invest Inc | "Three aspects of information: Current issues in trade secrets, client confidentiality and privilege" -- a new event | CJEU upon distribution right in Dimensione Direct Sales srl and Michele Labianca v Knoll International SpA| UK Supreme Court on Mere reputation and passing-off |… [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 5:10 am
Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267 [1st Dept 2004]; InKine Pharmaceutical Co., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 3:15 am
Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 336 F.3d 1322, 1330 (Fed. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
, pens this post about the well-known and much-debated issue of the product plain packaging [on which see earlier Katposts here, here, here, and here].* Court of Appeal dismisses Rovi's claim construction attempt in battle with VirginA few days ago the Court of Appeal of England and Wales handed down its decision in Rovi Guides Inc v Virgin Media Ltd & Others [2015] EWCA Civ 1214. [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 42 [week ending on Sunday 26 April] – C5's annual Pharmaceutical Patent Term Extensions Forum | UPC: patent attorney and client discuss | CJEU’s 2014 report | PUMA v PUDEL | Leaked Digital Single Market Strategy | Again of the EU Patent Package and alleged dangers| EU TM reform | Is Svensson’s new public ok? [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 6:05 am
Medtronic, Inc., 2013 U.S. [read post]
18 May 2015, 11:01 am
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 45 [week ending on Sunday 10 May] – INTA 2015 and the Kat | IP and Competition Law | Sky v Skype | CJEU v Spain | Digital Single Market Strategy | IPCom v HTC | European Qualifying Examination appealed | UPC fees | CJEU and 3-D marks | EPO Oral Proceedings.Never too late 44 [week ending on Sunday 3 May] – Forgotten principles and histories, and the role of complexity in patent law… [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 11:51 pm
After leaving the Fed, he was general counsel at American International Group, Inc. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 7:06 pm
MINNESOTA SETTLEMENT Minnesota Transit Constructors Inc. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
Tile, Inc. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 7:15 pm
King Pharmaceuticals v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
King Bio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (2003) 107 Cal.App.4th 1336, 1346; see, e.g., Sargent Fletcher, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 6:24 am
King Bio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (2003) 107 Cal.App.4th 1336, 1346; see, e.g., Sargent Fletcher, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 10:51 am
Oracle America Inc.: In one of the highest-profile intellectual property cases of the term, the justices will consider how software is protected under U.S. copyright law. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 6:20 pm
King Pharmaceuticals (Westlaw cite is 2006 WL 3716920), and the case number is WDQ-04-3521The blog had noted: the Court [in Merck v. [read post]
