Search for: "KIRK B. WATSON"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2007, 10:19 am
Watson v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 5:46 am
Duckworth told Watson . . . that Orman invited him over to the house to `get high. [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:32 am
" The previous year, working as a opposition researcher, I'd created an online "city council candidates hall of shame" in which I dumped oppo research on four candidates who all lost, including Kirk Watson's then-mayoral rival, Ronney Reynolds. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 7:42 am
The bill passed with a 30-1 vote, and interestingly enough, the one dissenting vote was actually a co-author of the bill, Senator Kirk Watson. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 7:46 am
Despite officials' incredulous comments, everyone quoted knows full well why Austin police cost so much - an extravagant union contract spearheaded by then Mayor Kirk Watson that made Austin police the highest paid officers in the country. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:37 am
According to the Office of Court Administration, there were 22,427 new Class B DWLI charges in 2018. [read post]
20 Oct 2007, 3:12 am
Kirk by Dr. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
Watson, No. 08-6261 (5/24/2010) Dismissed as improvidently granted Renico v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 6:09 am
• Richard B. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:52 pm
., boost development of non-animal alternatives in chemical testing and military training, call for a phase-out of federally-funded research on random-source dogs and cats sold by Class B dealers, ban killing of deer at Point Reyes National Seashore, and increase funding for enforcement and implementation of key animal welfare laws under the U.S. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
Bermudez, No. 06-5119 Conviction for possession of firearm by a felon is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not err in admitting police testimony as to drug-related statements made by defendant; 2) the use of a "blind strike" method in jury selection was both constitutional and consistent with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 24(b); and 3) comments made during the government's closing arguments were not unfairly prejudicial. [read post]
