Search for: "Kate Walgreen" Results 1 - 7 of 7
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
” by Antonia Noori Farzen for Washington Post Maryland: “Baltimore City Council to Weigh New Ethics Rules and Limits on Mayoral Power Amid Healthy Holly Controversy” by Ian Duncan and Kevin Rector for Baltimore Sun New Hampshire: “Financial Disclosure Bill Stalls in Senate” by David Solomon for Manchester Union Leader Lobbying National: “K Street Gets Behind Mayor Pete Buttigieg” by Kate Ackley for Roll Call Florida: “Opioid Lawsuit Bill… [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 10:16 am by Matt Van Steenkiste
Crew/crewcuts , Janie and Jack, Johnston & Murphy, Juicy Couture, kate spade new york, L’Occitane, Lacoste, Lego, Levi’s Store, Lilly Pulitzer, LOFT, Louis Vuitton, Lucky Brand Jeans, lululemonathletica, Lush, M.A.C., Madewell, Marmi, MaxAzria, MaxMara, Michael Kors, Montblanc, Needle & Thread, Neiman Marcus, Nine West, Nordstrom, OMEGA, Origins, Pacific Sunwear, Pandora, Papyrus, Paradise Pen Company, Pottery Barn, Pottery Barn Kids, Ralph Lauren, Restoration Hardware,… [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
Walgreen Co.,] a Sabbath accommodation case involving a Seventh-day Adventist. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 1:26 am by Steve Lubet
Kate has been gracious about this, to say the least. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 11:15 am by Chas Kissick
The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act created a mechanism for the federal government to reimburse testing locations like CVS and Walgreens for tests administered to uninsured individuals, but the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) portal through which testing centers apply for reimbursement asks for a Social Security number, driver’s license or state identification. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
It is a common refrain, mostly on the political right, that considering environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors when investing is probably illegal.[1] The basis for this argument derives from the fiduciary duty of loyalty and its corollary, the “sole interest” or “exclusive benefit” rule, enshrined in both federal and state law, which prohibits fiduciaries from investing for any purpose other than the financial well-being of the beneficiary. [read post]