Search for: "Kennedy v. England"
Results 1 - 20
of 179
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2019, 4:51 pm
The forum: Scotland v England The Trust raised an issue over jurisdiction in its pre-action correspondence with Mr Kennedy, arguing that England was not the appropriate jurisdiction for Mr Kennedy’s claim. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 7:35 am
The post Case Preview: Kennedy v The Charity Commission appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:11 pm
In Howard Kennedy v The National Trust for Scotland [2017] EWHC 3368 (QB), the High Court considered two complex issues: one relating to the doctrine of forum non conveniens and the other to the CPR provisions on service of a claim form. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:54 pm
This bill, along with a companion bill introduced by Senators Edward Kennedy (D-MA) and Patrick Leahy (D-VT), would nullify the Court’s ruling in Riegel v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 12:48 pm
Bailey v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:40 am
V. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 5:55 am
Boumediene v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 1:49 am
Environment Agency for England and Wales (Respondents) [2007] UKHL 41 Moncrieff and another (Respondents) v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 6:07 am
v=SY9PoR7-XGA.) [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 9:24 am
The center will also maintain a blog with contributions from Robinson; Dan Kennedy, assistant professor of journalism at Northeastern and author of the blog Media Nation; Doug Clifton, director of the New England First Amendment Coalition; and Tom Heslin, president of the coalition and interim executive editor at The Providence Journal. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 3:53 pm
One of the most closely watched cases of the Supreme Court's upcoming term is Wyeth v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 4:01 am
Saheid v. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 1:47 am
Kennedy R v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 12:48 pm
Most media reports and early commentary on Monday’s Supreme Court decision in Holland v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 4:53 am
In The New England Journal of Medicine, Nicholas Bagley, David Jones, and Timothy Jost discuss the possible impact of a decision in favor of the challengers in King v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 8:40 am
Waxman couldn't do it but there are two reasons why this seems not so damning: 1) As to the U.S., even in Johnson v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 9:45 am
(trademark infringement) 10/27: Mathilda and Terence Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology Trust v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 6:07 am
v=SY9PoR7-XGA.) [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 1:44 pm
Porter Magill v. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 4:00 am
Beery, Prophylactic Free Exercise: The First Amendment and Religion in a Post-Kennedy World, (Albany Law Review, Forthcoming).Jaclyn L. [read post]
