Search for: "Kennedy v. England"
Results 101 - 120
of 179
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2008, 11:20 am
King Billable Hour v. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm
Kennedy v The National Trust for Scotland, heard 21 November 2017 (Sir David Eady). [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 11:00 pm
R (on the application of the Law Society of England and Wales) v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 5:21 pm
I wrote about Justice Kennedy’s opinion on Monday, and wrote about Justice Alito’s concurring opinion on Tuesday. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:21 am
Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy’s opinion for the Court in Romer v. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 10:00 pm
John Fitzgerald Kennedy published his senior thesis at Harvard in 1940, “Why England Slept. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 4:55 am
"Judge gives word its ordinary meaning" was the striking headline of the IPKat's post last summer (here) on the decision of Mr Justice Mann (Patents Court, England and Wales) in Occlutech GmbH v AGA Medical Corp; Dot Medical Ltd [2009] EWHC 2013 (Ch). [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 4:43 am
A false claim of receiving military honors “does diminish the medal in many respects,” Justice Anthony Kennedy said during the hour-long argument in Washington. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 12:18 am
There's no other explanation.I was reminded of this the other day when I underwent the dreary ordeal of re-reading Justice Ginsburg's recent opinion in Cunningham v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
(Chy Lung v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am
The outlier was Verizon New England v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 1:10 pm
The first is BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
GINSBURG, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which KENNEDY, J., joined, and in which SCALIA, J., joined except as to Parts III and V–B–1.Note the additional shades of grey added by the Kagan + Alito concurrence and the partial reservation of Scalia's concurrence with Ginsburg and Kennedy.Court watchers will immediately note that this alignment has nothing to do with traditional “liberal” v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
GINSBURG, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which KENNEDY, J., joined, and in which SCALIA, J., joined except as to Parts III and V–B–1.Note the additional shades of grey added by the Kagan + Alito concurrence and the partial reservation of Scalia's concurrence with Ginsburg and Kennedy.Court watchers will immediately note that this alignment has nothing to do with traditional “liberal” v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:55 pm
W and B v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 7:25 am
England does not have the constitutional tradition of separation of church and state that the Supreme Court has said is embodied in the First Amendment. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 8:11 am
It was a critical factor is England's death penalty abolition a half century ago. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 12:46 pm
In NFIB v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am
” And even as far back as Gibbons v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 7:53 am
The following response in our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
