Search for: "Kern v. Commissioner of Social Security"
Results 1 - 3
of 3
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:17 am
Haan (Washington and Lee University), on Tuesday, November 12, 2019 Tags: Corporate Social Responsibility, Legal history, No-action letters, Rule 14a-8, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder activism, Shareholder proposals, Shareholder rights, Shareholder voting, Stakeholders, Supreme Court The 2019 CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability Posted by Bruce F. [read post]
