Search for: "Kevin B. Harris" Results 61 - 80 of 99
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2008, 1:28 am
Kevin Drum, McCain and bin Laden Political Animal, Would McCain ‘suspend’ again? [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm by Geoffrey Rapp
Hedges-Wright & Matthew Alex Ward, Personal foul: lack of captioning in football stadiums 45 VALPARAISO UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 967 (2011)Josh Chetwynd, Clubhouse controversy: a study of dispute resolution processes between teammates in Major League baseball, 16 HARVARD NEGOTIATION LAW REVIEW 31 (2011)Christopher B. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:06 am by John Elwood
§ 924(e)(2)(B)(ii). [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:20 am by Roshonda Scipio
Snyder.Snyder, Michael B., 1956-[Eagan, Minn.] : West, c2010.FederalismKF4600 .B45 2010Federalism / Anthony J. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
[We're moving this up, because we've received an updated version of the program. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am by Kedar Bhatia
United States 11-9335Issue: Whether this Court’s decision in Harris v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:17 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Court of Appeals majority reversed, in an opinion by Justice Kevin Jewell, joined by Justice Tracy Christopher. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 12:27 pm
There's also a reasonable argument that remaking ballots to avoid overvotes violates Sec. 3506.21(B)(3) of that law, which provides: If automatic tabulating equipment detects that more marks were made on an optical scan ballot for a particular office, question, or issue than the number of selections that a voter is allowed by law to make for that office, question, or issue, the voter's ballot shall be invalidated for that office, question, or issue. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 12:27 pm
There's also a reasonable argument that remaking ballots to avoid overvotes violates Sec. 3506.21(B)(3) of that law, which provides: If automatic tabulating equipment detects that more marks were made on an optical scan ballot for a particular office, question, or issue than the number of selections that a voter is allowed by law to make for that office, question, or issue, the voter's ballot shall be invalidated for that office, question, or issue. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 7:09 am by Rob Robinson
 http://bit.ly/taoOvt (Sharon Nelson) Judge Rules Feds Can Have WikiLeaks Associates’ Twitter Data - http://bit.ly/vDDWLr (Kevin Poulsen) KPMG Case Fuels Preservation Debate - http://bit.ly/slCpdV (Evan Koblentz) KPMG Judge Kicks the Sisyphean Stone of Proportionality Back Down the Hill - http://bit.ly/tTy1Tv (Chris Dale) Lawyer And Client Must Pay Big Sum For Rigging Facebook, But Juror Says It Didn’t Matter… [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 4:44 am by Bridget Crawford
Below the fold is Version 3.0 of the census of law prof Twitter users. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:00 am by Bridget Crawford
Below the fold is Version 3.1 of the census of law prof Twitter users. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Many cases allow people who allege they had been sexually assaulted to be pseudonymous,[1] including when they are defendants being sued for libel and related torts.[2] Indeed, some allow pseudonymity for the alleged attacker as well as the alleged victim, if the two had been spouses or lovers in the past, because identifying one would also identify the other, at least to people who had known the couple.[3] But again, many other cases hold otherwise, some in highly prominent cases (for instance,… [read post]