Search for: "Keys v. Cross"
Results 1 - 20
of 3,200
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2024, 5:29 pm
IntroductionThe recent decision in Baker v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 4:51 pm
What we think this means for 2020: From now until December 2020, cross-border transfers to and from the UK will remain as they are now, meaning they will not require special cross-border transfer mechanisms as required by Chapter V of GDPR. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:55 am
Key Take Away Points Long term disability insurers should be warry of taking hard line positions that result in trial decisions. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 7:10 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 7:51 am
To supplement the essay package, the ebook compiles an archive of the key documents in the Zeran v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 8:57 am
The 4th Circuit majority shoehorned the three-pronged test from Lemon v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
Cross-published at Tech Policy Press. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:10 am
App. 615 (1999), applied Hoffman to explicitly reject any such distinction: “Any implication that [the holding in Prevatte] might also be limited to principal or key prosecution witnesses was rejected when our Supreme Court applied the same rule to cross-examination of a corroborating witness. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 8:24 am
Fair v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 1:26 pm
Two Apple v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 7:34 am
The Texas Supreme Court last week decided Key Operating & Equipment, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 4:58 am
This would not be unlike company policies in the wake of US v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 5:39 am
January 3, 2019 In a recent case handed down by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, in Rebuck v. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:50 pm
Today’s ruling notes that “…the key evidence that is found in the Arheidt Declaration is hearsay which cannot be subject to cross-examination since it is simply an exhibit to the affidavits. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 7:34 am
They argued that the key, instead, lay in the vessels converging. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 7:04 am
This short post sets out some key points from the 200+ page decision relating to transfer compliance under the GDPR. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 10:04 am
In all three instances the court properly cited Wade v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 7:17 am
In addition, further to the Ontario Superior Court of Justice case Engel Canada Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 11:12 pm
The appellate hearing in the "Posner" Apple v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 7:15 am
Floyd LJ also agreed with statements made by Jacob LJ in Markem v Zipher [2005] EWCA Civ 267 that cross-examination on key evidence is important for procedural fairness, not just from the perspective of the parties, but also the witnesses. [read post]
