Search for: "Knowles Electronics, LLC"
Results 21 - 40
of 57
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2009, 6:51 am
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is Knowles Electronics LLC (“Knowles”) and the Respondent is Analog Devices Inc. [read post]
24 May 2010, 1:47 pm
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is Knowles Electronics LLC (“Knowles”), and the Respondent is Analog Devices, Inc. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 3:56 pm
The complaint alleges that Knowles Electronics LLC of Itasca, Illinois (“Knowlesâ€) and Mouser Electronics, Inc. of Mansfield, Texas (“Mouserâ€) (collectively, the “Proposed Respondentsâ€) unlawfully import into the U.S., sell for importation, and/or sell within the U.S. after importation certain surface mount MEMS (Micro-Electro-Mechanical System) microphones,… [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 2:49 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the Commission has identified Knowles Electronics LLC of Itasca, Illinois and Mouser Electronics, Inc. of Mansfield, Texas as respondents in this investigation. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 4:37 pm
According to the Notice, this investigation was instituted on January 14, 2008 based on the complaint of Knowles Electronics, LLC (“Knowles’) (the “‘629 investigation”). [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 4:30 pm
The investigation is based on a December 7, 2011 complaint and December 21, 2011 supplement to the complaint filed by Knowles Electronics LLC of Itasca, Illinois alleging violation of Section 337 in the importation into the U.S. and sale of certain silicon microphone packages and products containing the same that infringe, or that are made by a process that infringes, one or more claims of U.S. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 6:26 am
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is Knowles Electronics, LLC (“Knowles”) and the Respondent is Analog Devices, Inc. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 7:05 am
NXP sold its sound solutions business to Knowles Electronics, along with a few dozen patents. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:27 pm
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is Knowles Electronics LLC (“Knowles”), and the Respondent is Analog Devices, Inc. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 9:18 am
In Knowles Electronics v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 10:37 am
The Respondents are Knowles Electronics LLC and Mouser Electronics, Inc. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:34 pm
ALJ Rogers’ ID determined that Respondents Knowles Electronics LLC (“Knowles”) and Mouser Electronics, Inc. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:15 pm
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is Analog Devices, Inc (“Analog”). and the Respondents are Knowles Electronics LLC (“Knowles”) and Mouser Electronics, Inc. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 10:26 am
Regarding domestic industry, MemsTech appealed the Commission’s determination that Complainant Knowles Electronics LLC (“Knowles”) satisfied the technical prong of the domestic industry requirement with respect to the ‘089 patent. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 3:46 am
(Patent Infringement) District Court E D Texas: Defense wins JMOL at conclusion of plaintiff's case in Marshall patent trial: Southwest EFuel Network, LLC v Transaction Tracking Technologies, LLC (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas denies stays pending ex parte and inter partes reexam:Zapmedia Services, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 3:39 pm
The Respondents are Knowles Electronics LLC and Mouser Electronics, Inc. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 6:34 am
Research and Resources Tom Heron, “The ‘Safari workaround’ and the future of UK Data Protection: Disenfranchisement of Data Subjects in Lloyd v Google LLC” The Eagle, the Trinity College Law Gazette. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Gray On Claims) Precedential BPAI opinion rejects functional claim elements as indefinite and not enabled: Ex parte Rodriguez (Patently-O) BPAI issues opinions on four NTP patent re-examinations (12:01 Tuesday) ITC decides not to review ALJ's grant of Rambus' summary determination motion that its licensing activities satisfy the domestic industry requirement in certain semiconductor chips (337-TA-661) (ITC Law Blog) ITC issues final determination of no violation in matter concerning probe… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Gray On Claims) Precedential BPAI opinion rejects functional claim elements as indefinite and not enabled: Ex parte Rodriguez (Patently-O) BPAI issues opinions on four NTP patent re-examinations (12:01 Tuesday) ITC decides not to review ALJ's grant of Rambus' summary determination motion that its licensing activities satisfy the domestic industry requirement in certain semiconductor chips (337-TA-661) (ITC Law Blog) ITC issues final determination of no violation in matter concerning probe… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Gray On Claims) Precedential BPAI opinion rejects functional claim elements as indefinite and not enabled: Ex parte Rodriguez (Patently-O) BPAI issues opinions on four NTP patent re-examinations (12:01 Tuesday) ITC decides not to review ALJ’s grant of Rambus’ summary determination motion that its licensing activities satisfy the domestic industry requirement in certain semiconductor chips (337-TA-661) (ITC Law Blog) ITC issues final determination of no violation in matter… [read post]
