Search for: "Kumho" Results 141 - 151 of 151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2017, 2:18 pm by Schachtman
The Ambrosini case straddled the Supreme Court’s 1993 Daubert decision. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 5:29 am by Schachtman
No serious observer or scholar of the law of evidence can deny that the lower federal courts have applied Daubert and its progeny, and the revised Federal Rule of Evidence 702, inconstantly and inconsistently, in their decisions to admit or exclude proffered expert witness opinion testimony. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm by admin
Four Supreme Court cases (Daubert, Joiner, Kumho Tire, and Weisgram), and a major revision in Rule 702, ratified by Congress, all embraced the importance of judicial gatekeeping of expert witness opinion testimony to the fact-finding function of trials. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 4:54 am
Joiner, 522 U.S. 136 (1997); Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am by Schachtman
The current view, influenced no doubt by the Supreme Court’s holdings in Daubert, Joiner, and Kumho Tire, has settled on requiring the trial court to make an independent assessment, based upon a factual showing, that the “facts or data” in question may be reasonably relied upon by experts in the relevant field. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm by Schachtman
  Expert Evidence Under Daubert and Kumho,” 50 Case Western Reserve L. [read post]
7 May 2009, 6:08 am
Not one, but two, of our readers emailed us about a recent Sixth Circuit decision, Best v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 2:50 pm
She has lamented that while “the Daubert-Kumho standard [for admitting expert witness testimony] does not require the illusory perfection of a television show (CSI, this wasn’t), when liberty hangs in the balance -- and, in the case of the defendants facing the death penalty, life itself -- the standards should be higher . . . than [those that] have been imposed across the country. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:57 pm
i4i sued Microsoft for a pissant feature in Word: editing custom XML. [read post]