Search for: "L Oreal USA Inc"
Results 41 - 60
of 76
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2013, 7:23 am
L'Oreal, USA, Inc., 2013 WL 454861 (C.D. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 2:51 am
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.August 2, 2011 - 11 AM: L'Oreal USA, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 5:00 am
L’Oreal USA, Inc., 2:17-CV-01141 (W.D. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 1:46 pm
L’Oreal USA, Inc., 458 F.3d 244, 249 (3d Cir. 2006), the Court held that “collateral estoppel applies to bar the re-litigation of the invalid . . . patents. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:06 am
L’Oreal USA, Inc., the employee, Steven Trzaska claimed that he was fired in retaliation for his refusal to take actions which he believed violated the Rules of Professional Conduct (“RPC”). [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 11:06 am
L’Oreal USA, Inc., 2017 U.S. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 7:16 pm
L’Oreal,S.A., 129 F.3d 588, 595 (Fed. [read post]
19 Aug 2006, 6:08 am
L'Oreal USA, Inc., No. 05-4321 (3d Cir. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 1:57 pm
L'Oreal USA, Inc. (2005) 36 Cal.4th 1028; Richards iv CH2M Hill, Inc. (2001) 26 Cal.4th 798; Romano v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 9:41 pm
L'Oreal USA, Inc. (2005), firing an employee who refused to follow order which he reasonable believed was unlawful, was unlawful retaliation and constituted wrongful termination even though it was later found that the order given did not involve anything illegal. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 8:13 pm
L'Oreal USA, Inc. (2005) 36 C4th 1028, 1043. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 8:00 am
L'Oreal USA, Inc. (2005), firing an employee who refused to follow order which he reasonable believed was unlawful, was unlawful retaliation and constituted wrongful termination even though it was later found that the order given did not involve anything illegal. [read post]
17 May 2021, 2:54 pm
L’Oreal USA, Inc., (here) the Federal Circuit provided some insights into trade secrets and how they may be defeated with prior art given the “readily ascertainable” standard. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 2:43 am
L’Oreal USA, Inc., 374 F. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 10:14 am
L’Oreal USA, Inc. appears at CCH Advertising Law Guide ¶64,162. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 10:32 am
L'Oreal USA, a case where plaintiff alleged that the defendants marketed lipstick as “safe for use” when it contained dangerous amounts of lead, on the grounds that, in that case, there was “no allegation that the presence of lead in lipstick ha[d] any observable economic consequences. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 8:32 am
L’Oreal USA, Inc., 458 F.3d 244, 249 (3d Cir. 2006)). [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 9:27 am
L'Oreal USA, Inc., 406 F.3d 905, 910 (7th Cir. 2005). [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:17 pm
L'Oreal USA, Inc., (Cal. 2005). [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 8:20 am
L’Oreal USA, Inc., No. 19 CIV. 4362 (GBD), 2020 WL 5518484, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
