Search for: "L-3 Communications v. Collins"
Results 1 - 20
of 127
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2024, 2:56 pm
It involved a woman (Susan Kamuda) who had unknowingly inhaled the plant’s ETO for 22 years at her home 3 blocks away before she was diagnosed with breast cancer. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Collins and David M. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm
L. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:27 pm
Here is the entire complaint: Kestenbaum v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am
IPSO Resolution Statement – 21032-23 Collins v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation 16764-23 Loftus, Brame, Shearly-Sanders & McLeod v hadleigh.nub.news, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction Statements in open court and apologies We are not aware of any statements in open court or apologies in the last two weeks. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am
New Issued Cases There was one defamation (libel and slander) claim filed on the media and communications list last week. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
On the same day, Collins Rice J heard an application in the case of McGee v Lewis KB-2023-002435. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am
New Issued Cases There were three defamation (libel and slander) and one Miscellaneous claim(s) filed on the media and communication list in the last week. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
While Senate lobbied for private sector clients, the commission did not pay it for lobbying, only for communications and media training. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 4:36 pm
It depends on a combination of the inherent tendency of the words and their actual impact on those to whom they were communicated. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
On the same day, Collins Rice J made an order following a pre-trial review in the data protection case of Webster v HMRC. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
The statutory labeling of the Authority as private, and the fact that the Authority is organized as a private organization under state law, are constitutionally irrelevant, and in any event Appointments Clause doctrine does not demand that an Officer formally be a public employee. 3. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
IPSO Satisfactory Remedy – 18621-23 Booley v ok.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18524-23 Barnwell v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18355-23 A complainant v nationalworld.com, 14 Confidential sources (2021), No breach – after investigation Satisfactory Remedy – 17293-23 Reynolds v swindonadvertiser.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18392-23 Marshall De… [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am
Reserved Judgments Harcombe v Associated Newspapers, heard 3 to 7 and 10 to 11 July 2023 (Nicklin J) Smith v Backhouse, heard on 11 July 2023 (Asplin, Arnold and [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am
New Issued Cases There were no new issued cases in the Media and Communications list last week. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 4:55 pm
Ct. 881, 187 L. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:22 am
On 2 May 2023 Collins Rice J heard a case management hearing in the case of Nagi v Santhiramoulesan. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 11:31 am
One example, the appellate decision in Rosen v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
Figure 3: C. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm
Respondents also communicated that they felt a lack of control in relation to their privacy. [read post]
