Search for: "LANGLEY v. LANGLEY" Results 41 - 60 of 140
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2012, 9:09 am by Steve Hall
Medical records were unsealed Wednesday by Langley noting Druery's condition. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 1:57 am
The final sentence of 35 USC 103(a), entirely unaffected by KSR v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:24 pm by Steve Hall
The Supreme Court established standards to assess whether severely mentally ill inmates are competent to be executed in a 1986 case, Ford v. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 3:45 pm by Amanda Pickens Nitto
November 30, 2018) (putative class action alleging defendant sent misleading and deceptive collection letters stating “we assume this to be a valid debt” in violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act) Langley, et al. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 8:09 am
For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. 07a0379p.06 Langley v. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 3:40 am
It is settled law that that removal of children should usually be effected pursuant to an Emergency Protection Order (EPO), and that section 46 should only be used where it is not practicable to execute an EPO (Langley -v- Liverpool City Council). [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 2:30 pm
Langley, 33 M.J. 278 (C.M.A. 1991). [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 7:33 am by emagraken
The medical evidence seems clearly to establish that his injuries are permanent and that he will have to be diligent in pursuing a course of exercise and physiotherapy to maintain his present functioning. [41]         Of the cases relied on by the defendant under this heading of damages I find Langley v. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 1:14 am
Abbey National v Miller [2006] EWCA Civ 1520; [2007] EWCA Civ 138 Miller-Foulds v Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs [2008] EWHC 3443 (Ch); [2009] EWCA Civ 1132 You'd be forgiven for not having noticed any of this (long running) litigation over the last 3 years (if only because you need both Casetrack and Lawtel in order to find all four judgments, none of which seem to be on Bailii). [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 2:30 am by Michael Scutt
A case involving Dale Langley (my partner's) previous firm, Langley & Co, called Taylor v Connex South Eastern EAT/1243/99 [2000] held that a lapse of two years was insufficient. [read post]