Search for: "LEWIS v. FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, et al"
Results 61 - 80
of 115
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2012, 6:10 am
Lemley et al., Life After Bilski, 63 Stan. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 2:45 pm
” Plaintiffs-Appellants’ Consolidated Reply Brief at 2, City of Oakland, et al v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 9:49 am
CalPERS, et al. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
Next Door Company, et al. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 3:16 pm
Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment of the district court.Read More: George Clinton Can’t Prevent Sound Recordings From Being Sold Kitchen, et al v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 2:45 pm
” Plaintiffs-Appellants’ Consolidated Reply Brief at 2, City of Oakland, et al v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 2:45 pm
” Plaintiffs-Appellants’ Consolidated Reply Brief at 2, City of Oakland, et al v. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 4:06 pm
That Petition is before the Court in Florida House of Representatives, et al. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 11:02 am
Biomatrix, Inc. et al., No. 03-3677 (D.N.J. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:42 am
Winn, et al. (09-991), which the Court also granted. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
ADB Utility Contractors, Inc. (14-CA-27386, et al.; 348 NLRB No. 53) St. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
Opinion issued February 2, 2016 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00919-CV ——————————— JUAN A. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
That review was among the first of many such laudatory reviews of a treatise that went on to become canonical in the history of American constitutional law. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 6:07 pm
Salzburg et al. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 9:13 am
We have seen David Egilman attempt a personal appeal of a district court’s order excluding him as an expert. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
(GRAY on Claims) District Court E D Texas finds Applied Medical Resources liable for infringement of Covidien’s surgical device patent (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas limits number of patent claims and prior art references asserted in case: SynQor, Inc v Artesyn Technologies, Inc et al (Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Non-practising entity entitled to permanent injunction where infringed… [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:47 am
The brief also cautions the Supreme Court to be wary of giving too much discretion to District Court judges. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:59 am
Barclays Bank PLC, et al., 16-239. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 1:11 pm
Lemley et al., Life After Bilski, 63 Stan. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
Koninklijke Philips Electronics Docket: 09-389 Issue: Whether a party contesting the jurisdiction of the district court must first move to vacate or set aside a default judgment pursuant to either Rule 55(c) or Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in the District Court as a prerequisite to appealing the default judgment. [read post]
