Search for: "LI & S Co., Ltd" Results 101 - 120 of 344
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2019, 4:23 am
To this GuestKat’s knowledge, Poul Chang was the first time that the English court has considered these lis pendens provisions in the context of the Design Regulation [contrary insights welcome]. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 12:00 am
The invention lies in the putting together of the two therapeutic substances in the same formulation and the choice of the solvent. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 11:21 pm by Frank Cranmer
Introduction Trent College is a co-educational, independent day and boarding school. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
  "[The ruling] is a vindication of the principles Mattel has been pursuing all along," said Quinn Emanuel partner Michael Zeller, who is co-lead counsel with Quinn. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:48 am by Adam Baker
Turning to the second question Binnie J reviewed what was then the leading Canadian case on fundamental breach: Hunter Engineering Co. v Syncrude Canada Ltd. [1989] 1 SCR 426. [read post]
15 May 2013, 10:47 am
HTC v Apple is not formally inconsistent with Fujitsu Ltd's Application [1997] RPC 608 (CA) and Gale’s Application [1991] RPC 305 (CA), but those cases might very well be decided differently today. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 8:18 am
(See the final judgment here) In 2017, Beijing Feiniu Technology Co., Ltd filed a trade mark application for ‘DAY DAY UP’ (no 22683352) in class 36 for the services of, inter alia, real estate agency, real estate rental, financing services, art valuation, brokerage and insurance information. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:22 am
Pike recalled [at 86] the concept of goodwill in Inland Revenue Commissioners v Muller & Cos Margarine Ltd [1901] AC 217, where Lord Lindley said: “Goodwill regarded as property has no meaning except in connection with some trade, business, or calling… In this wide sense, goodwill is inseparable from the business to which it adds value. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 5:10 am by J
There was no suggestion that the officer had lied in his evidence. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 5:10 am by J
There was no suggestion that the officer had lied in his evidence. [read post]
12 May 2011, 5:54 am by INFORRM
There are five choices: the press decide where the balance lies; the Courts decide where the balance lies; Parliament changes the law (which is then interpreted by the Courts) so a new law decide where the balance lies; the balance is established by a regulatory regime; or the person whose privacy is invaded makes the decision. [read post]