Search for: "LIVELY v. BEST BUY et al"
Results 61 - 69
of 69
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2008, 4:10 pm
Tell that to Damien Hurst, Britart et al.. not to mention some of the great forgers... who do know how to paint… I started painting when I was at school. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
There are, in Britain, blawgs living in the canopy: discursive, analytical, erudite and contributing to legal practice and scholarship. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 11:28 am
Mercexchange, L.L.C. v. eBay, Inc., et al. 01-cv-00736, E. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 5:30 pm
Cohen v. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 5:53 am
Radley, et al., Off-Label Prescribing Among Office-Based Physicians, 166 Arch. [read post]
30 May 2007, 10:24 am
Farm Bureau Insurance Company, et al. , a 9-page opinion on rehearing, the Court reverses its earlier opinion (Nov. 8, 2006 - see ILB entry here - 2nd case) affirming the trial court. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
., et al., Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 11:25 am
I am opposed to the proposed rules on three grounds -- a misunderstanding of the concept of ethics (see Bates et. al. v State Bar of Arizona); the rules themselves will not likely be upheld at the first legal challenge to them; and there is clearly a misunderstanding of the meaning of marketing for lawyers and the long-term effects of Bates in serving both law firms and, most significantly, clients. [read post]
10 Nov 2006, 1:29 pm
I am opposed to the proposed rules on three grounds -- a misunderstanding of the concept of ethics (see Bates et. al. v State Bar of Arizona); the rules themselves will not likely be upheld at the first legal challenge to them; and there is clearly a misunderstanding of the meaning of marketing for lawyers and the long-term effects of Bates in serving both law firms and, most significantly, clients. [read post]
