Search for: "Lamar Outdoor Advertising"
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2022, 1:08 pm
Lamar Advantage and Clear Channel Outdoor v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 12:32 pm
Baltimore, Maryland, and Cincinnati, Ohio, like many cities, have municipal excise taxes on “outdoor advertising” — essentially, a business tax on rental billboard advertising space. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 7:05 am
In 2017, Reagan National Advertising and Lamar Advantage Outdoor Company applied for permits from the City of Austin to convert static off-premises billboards to digital signs. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 7:24 pm
A second company, Lamar Advantage Outdoor Co., later joined the case, where it too argued that the ban was unconstitutional. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 6:26 am
Lamar Advertising of Cincinnati, OH and Norton Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 6:52 am
Lamar Advertising of Cincinnati, OH and Norton Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:38 pm
Unlike Lamar and General Outdoor Advertising, the defendants did not own any billboards erected in the City before the 2004 ordinance went into effect. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 9:59 am
Lavan found that the City’s ban was unconstitutional both on its face and as applied to forty-five specific permit applications filed by Lamar Central Outdoor, LLC. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 8:35 pm
Lamar Advertising leases sign spacing for outdoor advertising and TLC has an ownership interest in several parcels of real property which Lamar leases for its outdoor advertising signs. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 1:30 pm
Private prison firms, casino operators, and outdoor advertising as REITs--time to get rid of tax subsidies for RE industries IRS Rethinking REIT Conversions Is Good News REITs Not So Neat at the IRS Hedge Funds Have Bought Lamar Advertising Co (LAMR), ITT Educational Services, Inc. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 1:30 am
(document storage operator), Lamar Advertising Co. [read post]
7 May 2012, 11:00 pm
Byron represent Lamar Outdoor Advertising, the case has been ongoing for nearly three years. [read post]
7 May 2012, 11:00 pm
Byron represent Lamar Outdoor Advertising, the case has been ongoing for nearly three years. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:24 am
A significant part of Lamar’s claimed damages were to outdoor advertising signs, or billboards, that were scattered throughout the country. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:24 am
A significant part of Lamar’s claimed damages were to outdoor advertising signs, or billboards, that were scattered throughout the country. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 3:19 pm
Nichols said he believes the jury's verdict hinged on the fact the school district entered into two billboard contracts with Lamar Outdoor Advertising Co. after it took the property. [read post]
25 May 2011, 9:20 am
Property Condemnation; disbursement The Lamar Company, LLC, d/b/a Lamar Outdoor Advertising, appeals from the circuit court’s final order that $120,000 on deposit with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Winnebago County shall be disbursed to Country Side Restaurant, Inc. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 7:33 am
blog advertising blog advertising [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 4:02 am
The billboard was owned by an outdoor advertising company who leased part of the property from the owner to construct the billboard. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 9:01 am
The employee was working for Lamar Outdoor Advertising, a billboard company, when he suffered a spinal injury after scaffolding collapsed beneath him. [read post]
