Search for: "Larkin v. Shah"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2016, 9:00 am
Larkin v Shah, C.A. 10918-VCS (August 25, 2016) This is one of two recent Court of Chancery decisions explaining that the Corwin case really does mean that there is an “irrebuttable business judgment rule” that bars challenges to a merger approved by a majority of the fully-informed, disinterested and uncoerced stockholders, in the absence of the deal involving a controlling stockholder who suffers from a conflict in the merger. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 3:00 am
As this Morris James blog explains: Larkin v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 6:57 am
Comstock (Aug. 24, 2016) and Larkin v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 1:57 pm
(“Comstock”), and Larkin v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 4:30 am
MG Financial, LLC v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 3:29 pm
Shah sought to swat that argument with Clinton v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 8:00 pm
Larkin v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:05 pm
" Larkin v. [read post]
