Search for: "Larry B May" Results 61 - 80 of 925
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2011, 6:34 am by Larry Ribstein
To be sure, says Cunningham, investors may recoil at the prospect of gadfly fellow shareholders challenging corporate pay contracts. [read post]
27 May 2012, 6:06 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
"On this day, his B-24 crashed (May 27, 1943). [read post]
23 May 2007, 2:41 pm
Also, such firm's clients may not want the disclosures that might be required of a public law firm. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Buce
  If he is a success, he is at best a success on balance--but that may be the best we have any right to expect. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 7:58 pm
Section 102(b)(7) of the DGCL provides that a corporate charter may contain a provision eliminating or limiting personal liability of a director for money damages in a suit for breach of fiduciary duty, so long as such provision does not affect director liability for “any breach of the director's duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders.... [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 5:15 am
  The Commission may, therefore, circumvent both the holding in Stoneridge and the limits on aiding and abetting by charging vendors as primary violators. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 10:36 pm by Kurt R. Karst
§ 842(c)(1)(B)(i) between December 2021 and May 2022 was $15,876. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 5:34 pm by Larry Jones
The report goes on to discuss a Patient B, who is a 21 year old who claims in one year she had 20-30 pelvic exams by Dr. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 11:43 am by DLA Piper
Article prepared by and republished courtesy of our colleagues Larry W. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 11:43 am by DLA Piper
Article prepared by and republished courtesy of our colleagues Larry W. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 7:19 am by Matt Roberts
” Taxpayers who entered into an abusive trust arrangement may wonder what steps the Government may take next or what is meant by the mandate to aggressively challenge such transactions. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 1:38 pm
Although Larry Ribstein portends broad ramifications from Jones v. [read post]