Search for: "Lee D. Smith" Results 61 - 80 of 543
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2021, 12:40 pm by Ana Popovich
” Senators Baldwin (D-WI), Blumenthal (D-CT), Brown (D-OH), Durbin (D-IL), Feinstein (D-CA), Hirono (D-HI), Klobuchar (D-MN), Markey (D-MA), Merkley (D-OR), Sanders (I-VT), Smith (D-MN), Van Hollen (D-MD), Whitehouse (D-RI) and Wyden (D-OR) all cosponsored this legislation in the Senate. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
God Save the United States and this Honorable County Board of Commissioners: Lund, Bormuth, and the Fight Over Legislative Prayer, 76 Washington & Lee Law Review 485-508 (2019). [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 1:27 pm by Derek T. Muller
Historically, Judges Conseulo Callahan and Sandra Ikuta have been among the most reliable dissental participants, with some regular voting from Judge Milan Smith, the only three President George W. [read post]
John Conyers (D-Mich.), Silvestre Reyes (D-Texas), and Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-Texas) at their word this time. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 2:52 pm
Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-TX) "enormous opposition. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 1:58 pm by Lydia Zuraw
Barbara Lee (D-CA), Louise Slaughter (D-NY), James Langevin (D-RI), Bobby Rush (D-IL), Charles Rangel (D-NY), Jim McDermott (D-WA) and Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC). [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 3:35 pm
He claimed that his Hebrew Israelite religion required him to shave his head for an indeterminate time after he came in contact with a dead body, namely his stillborn child.In Lee v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 8:50 am by Sara Amundson
Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore., and Christopher Smith, R-N.J., for their outstanding bipartisan mobilization of 188 Representatives who requested many of these provisions. [read post]
23 May 2019, 8:50 am by Sara Amundson
Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore., and Christopher Smith, R-N.J., for their outstanding bipartisan mobilization of 188 Representatives who requested many of these provisions. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 1:08 pm by Marty Lederman
Lee, that "[w]hen followers of a particular sect enter into commercial activity as a matter of choice, the limits they accept on their own conduct as a matter of conscience and faith are not to be superimposed on the statutory schemes which are binding on others in that activity,” at least where “[g]ranting an exemption . . . to an employer operates to impose the employer’s religious faith on the employees. [read post]